This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Bonding a metal bath

Good evening


I am having one of those moments where I can’t sleep because I am worrying about something I probably don’t need to. That’s the rational part of me talking, unfortunately the anxiety monster won’t b***** off. 


We have just had our old cast iron bath replaced with a nice new shiny steel one. The old bath was bonded back to the terminal block by main consumer unit over 6mm earth cable via the airing cupboard. We also have an electric shower. 


The new bath has no taps on it (they are wall-mounted and fed by copper pipes). The waste is all plastic. The electric shower has been replaced with a new electric shower. The copper pipes in the airing cupboard have been connected via a new 4mm earth cable. My electrician says that according to the 18th edition, there is no requirement for the metal bath to be bonded. 


I have no reason to doubt him, except for the anxiety monster eating away at my brain I mentioned earlier. What limited literature I have found seems to suggest this is correct, but in some circles it is a hotly debated topic with contradicting views. I was just wondering if someone could confirm this for me please. I would also be interested in understanding why this is the case to satisfy my own natural curiosity of all things!


Many thanks in advance
Parents

  • The assumption is there is a radiator present, which would be bonded together with the bath and any other metalwork. But we know that don't we, its been in the regs for 50 years. 



    No, not any metalwork - only exposed-conductive-parts and extraneous-conductive-parts - it's been specified like that at least as far back as the 15th Ed. A bath with no metallic pipe connections isn't likely to be an extraneous-conductive-part, neither indeed is simple radiator if it's fed with reasonable lengths of plastic pipe (despite any rust and inhibitor in the heating water).


       - Andy.
Reply

  • The assumption is there is a radiator present, which would be bonded together with the bath and any other metalwork. But we know that don't we, its been in the regs for 50 years. 



    No, not any metalwork - only exposed-conductive-parts and extraneous-conductive-parts - it's been specified like that at least as far back as the 15th Ed. A bath with no metallic pipe connections isn't likely to be an extraneous-conductive-part, neither indeed is simple radiator if it's fed with reasonable lengths of plastic pipe (despite any rust and inhibitor in the heating water).


       - Andy.
Children
No Data