This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Passing cables through joists

I know that this has been discussed in the old forum, but I have been pondering the subject over the past couple of days.


I am more than happy to respect the exclusion zones at the ends and in the middle of joists (Electrician's Guide to the Building Regulations); but it seems odd that cables which are passed through joists must go through notches in the zone between 0.07 - 0.25 times the span, and holes in the 0.25 - 0.40 zone.


In essence, despite the removal of a substantial amount of material, the upper joist in my diagram is acceptable, but the 16 mm hole in the lower one is not.

6023a2338ff6952232f44f2cc4478e57-huge-20190802joist.jpg


It seems to me that any risk to the cable is much lower in holes than notches; and of course, if plumbers have already occupied the notch zone, there isn't much choice.


In order to remove and replace cablies descending to sockets below, I need to lift the second board in from the wall; but it would be a real PITA to have to lift another board (especially if tongue and groove) closer to the centre of the room particularly because there isn't much working space unless the furniture is removed.


I have no intention of placing holes below notches, but will the house fall down if I don't follow the Guide? ?
Parents
  • …. although the neural axis experiences no extension or compression there is a substantial shear force on the neutral axis parallel to the length of the beam, especially towards the centre of the beam where the bending moment tends to be highest.  Drilling lots of holes along the neutral axis is not a good idea in the same way that having a lot of notches in the top isn't as in the limit you would create two beams lying on top of each other.

    The best way to understand this is to imagine two identical planks stacked up and supporting a load.  If the planks are free to move over each other they are less stiff than if they are rigidly connected (eg by screwing them together at regular intervals).  The connections bear the shear force which can be considerable..

    So the building regs recommendations arise from considering all of the stresses in the beam not just the vertical loads but those arising from bending too.
Reply
  • …. although the neural axis experiences no extension or compression there is a substantial shear force on the neutral axis parallel to the length of the beam, especially towards the centre of the beam where the bending moment tends to be highest.  Drilling lots of holes along the neutral axis is not a good idea in the same way that having a lot of notches in the top isn't as in the limit you would create two beams lying on top of each other.

    The best way to understand this is to imagine two identical planks stacked up and supporting a load.  If the planks are free to move over each other they are less stiff than if they are rigidly connected (eg by screwing them together at regular intervals).  The connections bear the shear force which can be considerable..

    So the building regs recommendations arise from considering all of the stresses in the beam not just the vertical loads but those arising from bending too.
Children
No Data