The IET is carrying out some important updates between 17-30 April and all of our websites will be view only. For more information, read this Announcement

Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 4 replies
  • Subscribers 31 subscribers
  • Views 4182 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

IP2X

lyledunn
I don’t want to hijack an earlier thread on the IP Code hence this fresh one. Is there a difference between IP2X and IPXXB?
Parents
  • 0
    Very good document Andy, thank you. 

    So enclosures are required to be at least IP4X or IPXXD top surface and IP2X or IPXXB elsewhere (416.2.2 and 416.2.1 respectively. Trunking is required to be IP4X or IPXXD all surfaces (521.10.1).

    According to the BEAMA document there is a caveat that the probe may make contact with elements with basic insulation providing that insulation can only be removed by a tool or through damage. 

    It would seem to me that the IPXXB and IPXXD stipulations are way less onerous. For example. IP4X requires the aperture to be not more than 1mm in diameter and a probe greater than 1mm should not pass through whereas IPXXD allows the 1mm probe to pass through a 35mm aperture for a distance of 100mm providing it does not make contact with live parts.

    I have, for example an EICR in front of me where a C2 has been given for trucking lid that has gaps of 25mm. I am sure that it is a tad unsightly but if the BEAMA document is correct then it would not be in breach of the requirements in 521.10.1 albeit not meeting IP4X. 

    Similarly, there seems to be a general stance taken that top surfaces of enclosures, like distribution boards, isolators etc, with apertures exceeding 1mm in diameter should be reported as a code but that is not necessarily the case if the probe cannot make contact with live parts within the 100mm length specified. 


Reply
  • 0
    Very good document Andy, thank you. 

    So enclosures are required to be at least IP4X or IPXXD top surface and IP2X or IPXXB elsewhere (416.2.2 and 416.2.1 respectively. Trunking is required to be IP4X or IPXXD all surfaces (521.10.1).

    According to the BEAMA document there is a caveat that the probe may make contact with elements with basic insulation providing that insulation can only be removed by a tool or through damage. 

    It would seem to me that the IPXXB and IPXXD stipulations are way less onerous. For example. IP4X requires the aperture to be not more than 1mm in diameter and a probe greater than 1mm should not pass through whereas IPXXD allows the 1mm probe to pass through a 35mm aperture for a distance of 100mm providing it does not make contact with live parts.

    I have, for example an EICR in front of me where a C2 has been given for trucking lid that has gaps of 25mm. I am sure that it is a tad unsightly but if the BEAMA document is correct then it would not be in breach of the requirements in 521.10.1 albeit not meeting IP4X. 

    Similarly, there seems to be a general stance taken that top surfaces of enclosures, like distribution boards, isolators etc, with apertures exceeding 1mm in diameter should be reported as a code but that is not necessarily the case if the probe cannot make contact with live parts within the 100mm length specified. 


Children
No Data

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines