This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Bonding of temporary metal fences at a Railway station platform

HI Chaps


One of the jobs I need to do in the near future is bond some temporary metal fences at a railway station platform.


I would not normally bond metal fences, but I know that this a requirement in this case; metal fences, metal stairways from the platform up to the overhead concourse etc


The overhead train HV lines are probably 5m away from these fences.


Do anyone have any further information for me so that I can understand why we are bonding these fences and what we are trying to achieve? 


I suppose its something to do with the HV side of things..................


Any help would be much appreciated


Kind Regards


Tatty
Parents
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Yes it is something of a curious system.

    The feeder design actually allow a greater voltage drop in the catenary to allow economy of design and allows feeder stations to be located further apart, with consequent lower number of national grip supply points.  I have seen models with a worst case far-end catenary voltage of less than 20kV (some of the trains decide that enough is enough if the supply voltage drops to 19kV and pull their own plug).

    Fortunately the system has a much lower impedance in the return paths, so we are able and obliged to design the system so as to keep rail (traction return) voltages below 25V at stations otherwise there would be intolerable touch potentials at the rails, or at any bonded metalwork, much of which is accessible to rail staff and the general public alike.

    One can see that the network is far from simple, with multiple effective earth connections in the return path.  There are other subtleties which I won't bore anyone else with here.

    On a final point, the booster transformer system is being phased out because certain unscrupulous people would steal the copper conductors (a hazardous occupation, with at least one culprit 'paying the price' instead of 'getting the price' later).  Longer term plans will replace this with high level aluminium conductors as part of improved system designs (AT).
Reply
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Yes it is something of a curious system.

    The feeder design actually allow a greater voltage drop in the catenary to allow economy of design and allows feeder stations to be located further apart, with consequent lower number of national grip supply points.  I have seen models with a worst case far-end catenary voltage of less than 20kV (some of the trains decide that enough is enough if the supply voltage drops to 19kV and pull their own plug).

    Fortunately the system has a much lower impedance in the return paths, so we are able and obliged to design the system so as to keep rail (traction return) voltages below 25V at stations otherwise there would be intolerable touch potentials at the rails, or at any bonded metalwork, much of which is accessible to rail staff and the general public alike.

    One can see that the network is far from simple, with multiple effective earth connections in the return path.  There are other subtleties which I won't bore anyone else with here.

    On a final point, the booster transformer system is being phased out because certain unscrupulous people would steal the copper conductors (a hazardous occupation, with at least one culprit 'paying the price' instead of 'getting the price' later).  Longer term plans will replace this with high level aluminium conductors as part of improved system designs (AT).
Children
No Data