The IET is carrying out some important updates between 17-30 April and all of our websites will be view only. For more information, read this Announcement

This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Underfloor Bus Bar Systems

The Definition in the Regulations for a Socket states " A Device, provided with Female Contacts, which is intended to be installed with the fixed wiring, and intended to receive a plug. A Luminaire track system is not regarded as a socket-outlet system"

From the above it would be my understanding that the Tap-Offs on an underfloor Bus Bar system are considered to be sockets. The exclusion of Luminaire track systems also appears to support this viewpoint as it infers that power Underfloor Bus Bar should be classed as sockets.
Parents

  • The ability of an electrical accessory to supply an appliance (or flex) doesn't make it a plug either.



    Indeed - I was just making the point that the approach of thinking "the difference being that the plug is intended for both electrical connection and mechanical retention of a flexible cable, whereas a tap-off unit need not directly supply a flexible cable" doesn't really help given BS 7671's rather outdated definitions, as many types of tap-offs are supplied pre-wired with flex. The same argument applies the other way around too - if I plug a "wall wart" kind of appliance into a BS 1363 outlet, does the outlet cease to be a socket? (of course not I would have said, since it's still capable of accepting a plug that supplies a flex... but that then brings up back to the OP's point of being able to distinguish them using BS 7671's definitions).


    I'm not arguing against your conclusions - quite the reverse! But I do still sympathise with the OPs situation and think that BS 7671's definitions could do with a bit of an update (or complete overhaul). As things stand we're still not even quite sure what's meant by "fixed wiring" - is a dangling flex permanently connected at one end to the rigid building wiring part of the fixed wiring or not?


      - Andy.
Reply

  • The ability of an electrical accessory to supply an appliance (or flex) doesn't make it a plug either.



    Indeed - I was just making the point that the approach of thinking "the difference being that the plug is intended for both electrical connection and mechanical retention of a flexible cable, whereas a tap-off unit need not directly supply a flexible cable" doesn't really help given BS 7671's rather outdated definitions, as many types of tap-offs are supplied pre-wired with flex. The same argument applies the other way around too - if I plug a "wall wart" kind of appliance into a BS 1363 outlet, does the outlet cease to be a socket? (of course not I would have said, since it's still capable of accepting a plug that supplies a flex... but that then brings up back to the OP's point of being able to distinguish them using BS 7671's definitions).


    I'm not arguing against your conclusions - quite the reverse! But I do still sympathise with the OPs situation and think that BS 7671's definitions could do with a bit of an update (or complete overhaul). As things stand we're still not even quite sure what's meant by "fixed wiring" - is a dangling flex permanently connected at one end to the rigid building wiring part of the fixed wiring or not?


      - Andy.
Children
No Data