This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Wylex 100A dp isolators in plastic enclosures.

Just wondered  why these are not classed as "similar switchgear" to consumer units etc which are supposed to be in

non flammable enclosures in domestics.

                                          Regards,Hz
Parents

  • mapj1:




    I think with all that in mind, an upfront outboard RCD in a metal box is by far the worst way to go on a TT earthing system.






    Agree, with a note that a switch in a metal box feeding a selection of non RCS protected bus bar or split tails to many RCDs is much worse than an RCD in a smaller metal box with only tails in and out and nothing else.

    It would be safer with an un-earthed metal box, and some more insulation inside.

    The safest solution by far is an RCD on its own in a plastic box, tails in and out and no electrode only CPC anywhere near it.




    Agreed



    The regs in their current form can be read in a way that seems to recommend some  highly suspect practice.





    That's partly what I'm trying to illustrate. Let's be clear, I don't want to make a serious objection to the plastic REC2 isolator, and, if individual designers or installers believe that a plastic box with RCD meets the regs and is safe, then they should, of course follow their experience.


    It's worth considering that, if BS 7671 (and its interpretation) were too prescriptive, some installations would not be practicable. I guess it's easier to be prescriptive in the tighter parameters of small houses, for example, but other installations need thinking "outside the box".

Reply

  • mapj1:




    I think with all that in mind, an upfront outboard RCD in a metal box is by far the worst way to go on a TT earthing system.






    Agree, with a note that a switch in a metal box feeding a selection of non RCS protected bus bar or split tails to many RCDs is much worse than an RCD in a smaller metal box with only tails in and out and nothing else.

    It would be safer with an un-earthed metal box, and some more insulation inside.

    The safest solution by far is an RCD on its own in a plastic box, tails in and out and no electrode only CPC anywhere near it.




    Agreed



    The regs in their current form can be read in a way that seems to recommend some  highly suspect practice.





    That's partly what I'm trying to illustrate. Let's be clear, I don't want to make a serious objection to the plastic REC2 isolator, and, if individual designers or installers believe that a plastic box with RCD meets the regs and is safe, then they should, of course follow their experience.


    It's worth considering that, if BS 7671 (and its interpretation) were too prescriptive, some installations would not be practicable. I guess it's easier to be prescriptive in the tighter parameters of small houses, for example, but other installations need thinking "outside the box".

Children
No Data