Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 14 replies
  • Subscribers 31 subscribers
  • Views 2323 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Electrical Installation User's Manual.

Zoomup
We are provided with user's/owner's operation manuals with many products these days, such as with new cars or domestic electrical appliances.


Should we provide one regarding domestic electrical installations, especially if we are letting a house or flat, or after a rewire? The manual could simply cover the use of the electrical installation and the operation of consumer units and internal devices such as the main switch, M.C.B.s, R.C.B.Os and R.C.D.s. Does one exist in printed paper form already?


Z.


Parents
  • 0

    davezawadi:

    Whilst this all sounds very good in principle, it may well be a bad idea, because if there is any tiny deviation from the actual installation or changing regulations you may find yourself liable for adverse outcomes.


    To give an example, if you have a general anesthetic in hospital you will be given a longish sheet saying that some outcomes may not be very safe for you, and you could be considerably bad, even dead. You may have seen on TV recently a chap who had a bad outcome, in that he could feel some actions of his operation, and wanted to sue everyone in sight as they were negligent he says. Everything he complained about will be on that sheet, which he will have signed as risks he was prepared top take. His choice, sign or no operation. It is becoming close to the time where we may need a disclaimer on electrical work, because some people think one can abuse the installation and it is always someone else's fault! No win - No fee should never have been permitted, unfortunately it came from the USA and some lawyers loved it.




    Well, you would have to word your instruction manual carefully.


    I think that UK orthodoxy is still to be careful about giving dire warnings to anxious patients. However, to give an example, would you want your child's tonsils removed if you were told that the risk of death is 1:20,000?


    Not particularly relevant to electrickery. "Madam, the defective fuse board is a C2. That means that if you don't have it replaced, there will be a 1:20,000 risk of getting electrocuted."


    The principle that giving a warning absolves the practitioner/tradesman from negligence is unsound. Awareness under anaesthetic is a slam dunk! A surgeon is hardly likely to say, "If I make a cock up, you will never walk again" any more than an electrician might say "If I make a cock up, your whole house will be lethal."


    So thinking about this, electricians are far safer than surgeons. ?


    ETA: Another difference is that surgeons are not exposed to personal risk at work, although Professor of Surgery, Harold Ellis used to delight in mentioning the case with 300% mortality. It was something to do with a surgeon doing an amputation in pre-anaesthetic times when speed was of the essence. In wielding his knife, he managed to slice through an assistant and even himself. All three died of sepsis.

Reply
  • 0

    davezawadi:

    Whilst this all sounds very good in principle, it may well be a bad idea, because if there is any tiny deviation from the actual installation or changing regulations you may find yourself liable for adverse outcomes.


    To give an example, if you have a general anesthetic in hospital you will be given a longish sheet saying that some outcomes may not be very safe for you, and you could be considerably bad, even dead. You may have seen on TV recently a chap who had a bad outcome, in that he could feel some actions of his operation, and wanted to sue everyone in sight as they were negligent he says. Everything he complained about will be on that sheet, which he will have signed as risks he was prepared top take. His choice, sign or no operation. It is becoming close to the time where we may need a disclaimer on electrical work, because some people think one can abuse the installation and it is always someone else's fault! No win - No fee should never have been permitted, unfortunately it came from the USA and some lawyers loved it.




    Well, you would have to word your instruction manual carefully.


    I think that UK orthodoxy is still to be careful about giving dire warnings to anxious patients. However, to give an example, would you want your child's tonsils removed if you were told that the risk of death is 1:20,000?


    Not particularly relevant to electrickery. "Madam, the defective fuse board is a C2. That means that if you don't have it replaced, there will be a 1:20,000 risk of getting electrocuted."


    The principle that giving a warning absolves the practitioner/tradesman from negligence is unsound. Awareness under anaesthetic is a slam dunk! A surgeon is hardly likely to say, "If I make a cock up, you will never walk again" any more than an electrician might say "If I make a cock up, your whole house will be lethal."


    So thinking about this, electricians are far safer than surgeons. ?


    ETA: Another difference is that surgeons are not exposed to personal risk at work, although Professor of Surgery, Harold Ellis used to delight in mentioning the case with 300% mortality. It was something to do with a surgeon doing an amputation in pre-anaesthetic times when speed was of the essence. In wielding his knife, he managed to slice through an assistant and even himself. All three died of sepsis.

Children
No Data

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines