This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Thoughts on 3M max tails protection with SPD & isolator in tails?

DNO allowance for tails protection from their fuse is commonly 3M. - 3M is deemed AFAICT to extent through any in-line isolator, whether or not that isolator is property of DNO or is consumer fitted part. (The latter is not spelled out by DNO SSEPD who  just state the 3M tails figure without further qualification).
If said isolator begins to sprout additional complexity such as MCB and SPD as a shunt addition, my interpretation (Definitions, part 2) is that it still doesn’t yet qualify as a consumer unit, hence the 3M rule could be said to still run straight through it as far as the farthest CU.

- Any thoughts?


Parents
  • I agree the 3m is a DNO requirement. They guarantee that the cutout fuse will operate for a fault within 3m. It may well operate for longer tails, but have all made the decision that they don’t have the time to do the calculations for each individual property. The customer must have over current protection after the first 3m, and rate it for their design of the extended tails, even if it doesn’t grade with the cutout fuse. 


    Regards,


    Alan.
Reply
  • I agree the 3m is a DNO requirement. They guarantee that the cutout fuse will operate for a fault within 3m. It may well operate for longer tails, but have all made the decision that they don’t have the time to do the calculations for each individual property. The customer must have over current protection after the first 3m, and rate it for their design of the extended tails, even if it doesn’t grade with the cutout fuse. 


    Regards,


    Alan.
Children
No Data