This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Regulation 534.4.4.6

Greetings to the forum.

Can someone clarify this for me. Regulation 534.4.4.6 says:
"In general, the short-circuit current rating ISCCR of an SPD, as stated by the manufacturer, shall not be lower than the maximum prospective short-circuit current at the connection points of the SPD assembly"

Then Note 1 below the regulation says:
"The SPD alone, or as an assembly in conjunction with its disconnector and/or overcurrent protective device (OCPD), is required to withstand the short-circuit current rating ISCCR as stated by the manufacturer. This value is defined and tested according to BS EN 61643-11, in conjunction with the disconnector and/or OCPD as stated by the manufacturer"


I understand that ISCCR (in kA) is a short circuit withstand capability value given by the manufacturer on the condition the maximum upstream protective device rating is not exceeded.


If the upstream SPD protective breaker/fuse has a breaking capacity higher than the system fault level, can an SPD with a ISCCR lower than the system fault level be used? I am confused because Note 1 says either the SPD alone or SPD+Disconnector as an assembly has to withstand the system fault level.


Reason for all this scenario is because I have come across an SPD with short circuit withstand capability of 25kA protected upstream by a breaker with Icu of 50kA is specified on a system with 37kA fault level.


Thanks,

M.


Parents
  • I think this question should have some serious discussion with the manufacturers, because it points to a potential difficulty with SPDs fitted on larger systems. Whilst I think that failure dead short of a device is very unlikely, it seems to be a serious snag and cost to have to fit a series fuse to limit potential fault levels. A simple design feature such as a fusible connection, would fail open at extreme fault level and even if an arc is formed would reduce current to manageable levels. In fact I would be more worried that short circuit failure would result in perhaps a few 10s of milliohms and the resulting dissipation start a serious fire, but with little possibility of an upstream CPD operating. In many ways I am far from convinced that SPDs at the supply end of an installation are necessary, and the idea that this may prevent damage to appliances, such as VFDs will work. Semiconductor designs already contain features to limit surge damage, and are in general very reliable unless there is a direct lightning strike, and in that case an SPD is unlikely to make much difference anyway.

Reply
  • I think this question should have some serious discussion with the manufacturers, because it points to a potential difficulty with SPDs fitted on larger systems. Whilst I think that failure dead short of a device is very unlikely, it seems to be a serious snag and cost to have to fit a series fuse to limit potential fault levels. A simple design feature such as a fusible connection, would fail open at extreme fault level and even if an arc is formed would reduce current to manageable levels. In fact I would be more worried that short circuit failure would result in perhaps a few 10s of milliohms and the resulting dissipation start a serious fire, but with little possibility of an upstream CPD operating. In many ways I am far from convinced that SPDs at the supply end of an installation are necessary, and the idea that this may prevent damage to appliances, such as VFDs will work. Semiconductor designs already contain features to limit surge damage, and are in general very reliable unless there is a direct lightning strike, and in that case an SPD is unlikely to make much difference anyway.

Children
No Data