This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

421.1.201.

Mornin' All,

                      is there available an insulated enclosure, non conducting, suitable for a double pole D.I.N. rail mounted R.C.D. that complies with 421.1.201 please.


Z.
Parents

  • Farmboy:




    Zoomup:

    Thanks all. I was just checking to see if anything had changed after the long discussions about this subject in the past. I intend to place a 100mA S type R.C.D. before a new metal cased consumer unit on a TT earthed installation.




    Could the S type not go in the CU as per section 2.2.6 of the OSG?



    Yes, that seems to be the common way, but if an isolator is going to be installed in a (domestic) TT installation, then why would you not use an RCD "main switch" instead of an ordinary one in your REC2 (or similar) enclosure? The you can stop worrying about your tails flapping about or getting chaffed - as if that could happen when competently installed!

Reply

  • Farmboy:




    Zoomup:

    Thanks all. I was just checking to see if anything had changed after the long discussions about this subject in the past. I intend to place a 100mA S type R.C.D. before a new metal cased consumer unit on a TT earthed installation.




    Could the S type not go in the CU as per section 2.2.6 of the OSG?



    Yes, that seems to be the common way, but if an isolator is going to be installed in a (domestic) TT installation, then why would you not use an RCD "main switch" instead of an ordinary one in your REC2 (or similar) enclosure? The you can stop worrying about your tails flapping about or getting chaffed - as if that could happen when competently installed!

Children
No Data