Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 44 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 4234 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

The Western HVDC Link

Alan Capon
I did originally answer the previous thread, but have since deleted my response and I believe a new thread with a proper and correct title is the correct way of answering. 


More info on the fault here: https://www.energy-reporters.com/transmission/italys-prysmian-under-fire-over-uk-interconnector-failure/ 


Reports suggest an undersea cable fault in the vicinity of Liverpool Bay. 


Regards,


Alan.
Parents
  • 0

    John Russell:

    . . . in 1998 I ran the system studies to optimise the design for BICC who became the contractor.  We established 90kV as the optimal voltage when the expectation (and the rival design from Pirelli) was 132kV.  I hope it's still the longest ac subsea interconnector in the world, because that's what it says on my CV ?




    As far as I am aware, it is still the longest ac subsea interconnector in the world. Were you BICC or National Grid? 


    Regards,


    Alan. 

Reply
  • 0

    John Russell:

    . . . in 1998 I ran the system studies to optimise the design for BICC who became the contractor.  We established 90kV as the optimal voltage when the expectation (and the rival design from Pirelli) was 132kV.  I hope it's still the longest ac subsea interconnector in the world, because that's what it says on my CV ?




    As far as I am aware, it is still the longest ac subsea interconnector in the world. Were you BICC or National Grid? 


    Regards,


    Alan. 

Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines