This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Dodgy wiring

Had a call today from a lady saying her shower wasn't working. Apparently, an electrician had installed a replacement, but couldn't get it to work, so just left the job saying the house needed a rewire - and took £125 from them to-boot.


I went there and saw that it's a 9.5KW shower (at 240v) that is wired in 10mm2 T&E from CU to wall DP Switch outside the bathroom. The electrician had pulled out the existing cable (size unknown) from switch to shower (that are on the same wall, back to back approx 600mm apart) and replaced it with 2.5mm2 T&E, diagonally from the switch into the back of the shower, which he had put into the wall by gouging out the plasterboard and leaving it in the small void between the plasterboard and inner brick wall. 


He had tested the circuit with his screwdriver voltage tester, and concluded the shower was faulty because the circuit was live but the original shower didn't work, so it had to be a faulty shower. In fact all it was was an inoperative neutral contact in the DP switch, so the original shower was probably ok but couldn't be put back on the wall because he had cut the cold water inlet off in the shower with a saw instead of just unscrewing the pipe from the inlet.


The question is, is there anyone the homeowner can report this man to, firstly, because of the undersized cable, and secondly, because he's taken their money without completing the job?


F
  • Council trading standards department, also is he a member of a scheme?
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Trading standards for taking payment without completing the work 


    as for crap wiring unfortunately that’s life , see it every day

  • Typiod:

    Council trading standards department, also is he a member of a scheme?




    Seemingly not, as he did it as a homer for a friend of a friend.

  • some 'Friend' to have taken payment..... for not doing a job !


    Does the 'Friend' of that fiend... wish to ask for the money back...

    (now they know the incompetence/uneccessary damage done)


    and did they have insurance, or qualifications for work in such a location.

    Is it likely that they will do another 'homer', if not - it is a foolish home owner taking their own risks ?

    if it likely to happen elewhere ... who polices the such things (apart from Fire officers etc due to that risk, and council H&S people)


    Maybe word of/the inference of H&S/electrocution risk of not having professional cover is enough to curb the enthusiasm.. ?



  • £125 = cost of shower from diy store. Friend of a friend = Mr Householder who bought the shower and got stuck when it didn’t work. Am I too cynical? Maybe. 


    I had it the other day with a builder I still don’t believe existed. 


    Regards,


    Alan.

  • Farmboy:




    Typiod:

    Council trading standards department, also is he a member of a scheme?




    Seemingly not, as he did it as a homer for a friend of a friend.



    Which might rule out the legal protection of a contract.


    So if registered (unlikely) he could be kicked out of a CPS and I am not sure what Trading Standards could achieve. Caveat Emptor!


    CPSs do offer protection to customers and my Stroma card is evidence of membership, but I wonder how many customers ask to see such evidence.

  • Clearly a case of the "electrician" working on a risk and reward basis.

    Insured not relevant if a one man band.

    I would think Trading Standards would be interested in the safety aspect and payment areas.

    That`s IMHO .


    I do like Alan`s statement about a tradesman`s existence though