Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 70 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 4774 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Details of BS7671:2018 Amendment 1 are here.

Alan Capon
Details of Amendment 1 of BS7671:2018 is available here: https://electrical.theiet.org/bs-7671/updates/


Regards,


Alan.
Parents
  • 0
    Is 722 not just a get out of jail card for DNOs? It is clear from this Section that no reliance can be placed on the neutral connection with earth yet 114.1 provides for the exact opposite.  Had there been no PME concern raised in 722, the onus would have remained squarely on them, at least for the domestic side of things.

    The clear implication in 722 is that regulation 114.1 cannot be cited for any installation, whether supplying EVs or not.

Reply
  • 0
    Is 722 not just a get out of jail card for DNOs? It is clear from this Section that no reliance can be placed on the neutral connection with earth yet 114.1 provides for the exact opposite.  Had there been no PME concern raised in 722, the onus would have remained squarely on them, at least for the domestic side of things.

    The clear implication in 722 is that regulation 114.1 cannot be cited for any installation, whether supplying EVs or not.

Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines