ebee:
"Aren’t the SRCD trip times faster?
Andy B. I`m not sure that this is the case.
Our old BS for RCDs was within 200ms at x1 wheras the EN we now all use is within 300ms at x1, which in itself makes our old standard appear superior.
However I find that in practice all of the functioning RCDs I`ve tested trip well within those times of both standards. In fact if I found one that approached say 90ms area I would be very alarmed as I once was when a pal of mine tested two RCDs on a connected circuit. We soon established the number of fridges/freezers running to be skewing the results.
Anyone else concour or disagree (mine is only a limited sample)?
ebee:
"Aren’t the SRCD trip times faster?
Andy B. I`m not sure that this is the case.
Our old BS for RCDs was within 200ms at x1 wheras the EN we now all use is within 300ms at x1, which in itself makes our old standard appear superior.
However I find that in practice all of the functioning RCDs I`ve tested trip well within those times of both standards. In fact if I found one that approached say 90ms area I would be very alarmed as I once was when a pal of mine tested two RCDs on a connected circuit. We soon established the number of fridges/freezers running to be skewing the results.
Anyone else concour or disagree (mine is only a limited sample)?
We're about to take you to the IET registration website. Don't worry though, you'll be sent straight back to the community after completing the registration.
Continue to the IET registration site