The IET is carrying out some important updates between 17-30 April and all of our websites will be view only. For more information, read this Announcement

This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Lightning Protection.

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
Good morning all.


Part of our electrical contracting services involve lightning protection testing and maintenance. On more than one occasion now we have come up against a situation where the resistance of 1 or more of a group of electrodes is greater than 10 Ohms, i.e  

R1 = 8.51

R2 = 22.4

R3 = 13.82

R4 = 71.3

R5 = 42.8

R6 = 38.4

R5 = 112.4


The IEE electrical maintenance publication calculates maximum resistance to earth should not exceed the number of electrodes X 10. On the example above 70 Ohms would be the maximum indicating R4 & R5 would not comply. When Lightning protection companies commission lightning protection systems their certificates use the resistances in parallel method: R TOTAL = 1 divided by (1/R1 + 1/R2 + 1/R3 + 1/R4 + 1/R5 + 1/R6 + 1/R7) In this case the total resistance of the system would be 3.28 Ohms.


Although the test complies with the overall resistance of the system the individual electrode resistance does not. The publication seems to contradict itself here. Please see attached highlighted sections. Improving the resistance of the earth is not practicable as the surrounding area in encased in concrete in most cases.


Should I be issuing a satisfactory certificate for the installation with comments on the individual electrode readings?


Kind Regards

Stephen Cherry

Parents
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Hi Mapj.

    It probably would be eaisier with a type B system. There's a lot of concrete.
Reply
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    Hi Mapj.

    It probably would be eaisier with a type B system. There's a lot of concrete.
Children
No Data