Dear me Clive, I hope you are not paying for this. If I were anything to do with a report like this where whoever wrote it doesn't even understand what is being written, and makes claims about output, cost, and repayments which are clearly nonsense, it would be a simple case of "on your bike"! Electricity for 5600 houses? What about when it is dark (when a lot of domestic consumption takes place)? This is a case of "someone else will pay for the gas turbine capacity required, so that you and I can make a few bob". This is entirely the problem with the whole renewables scam, making it work in any useful way is "someone else's problem" while we get a bit of kudos. How much are they expecting to be paid for this electricity? £100 per MWh might well put an entirely different polish on the plan. Flintshire is also a bit far North for effective solar, it does make quite a difference to output and again the payback. On a lighter note the MW/hr when it is dark are negative due to the stuff on standby!
Dear me Clive, I hope you are not paying for this. If I were anything to do with a report like this where whoever wrote it doesn't even understand what is being written, and makes claims about output, cost, and repayments which are clearly nonsense, it would be a simple case of "on your bike"! Electricity for 5600 houses? What about when it is dark (when a lot of domestic consumption takes place)? This is a case of "someone else will pay for the gas turbine capacity required, so that you and I can make a few bob". This is entirely the problem with the whole renewables scam, making it work in any useful way is "someone else's problem" while we get a bit of kudos. How much are they expecting to be paid for this electricity? £100 per MWh might well put an entirely different polish on the plan. Flintshire is also a bit far North for effective solar, it does make quite a difference to output and again the payback. On a lighter note the MW/hr when it is dark are negative due to the stuff on standby!
