This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Voltage drop in building networks

The recent posts about building networks has got me thinking - is there any recommendation for maximum permitted voltage drop within building networks?


Generally the DNO are allowed their +10/-6% variation and then BS 7671 generally allows 5% (or 3%) drop within the consumer's installation - and seemingly most ordinary appliances seemed to be based on a total of those - which is fine where the consumer's installation is directly connected to the DNO's system. But what about when there's maybe many tens of metres of extra cable involved courtesy of a BNO?


I guess that in the old days, when the distributor had responsibility all the way to the meter (so including the BNO as we'd now call it where the meter is at the consumer's end) the ESQCR limits would have applied at the meter terminals so the DNO would have had to designed to a tighter limit at the building's cutout - does anyone know if they still do that?


Otherwise there would seem to need to be some co-ordination between the design of the BNO and the consumer's installation - should the BNO formally 'declare' to the consumer's designer the v.d.? - perhaps as part of the tolerance on nominal voltage?


    - Andy.
Parents

  • broadgage:

    In the case of a larger or more complex building network, then IMO engineering judgement may be applied to justify a greater voltage drop. A large building network implies either an on site substation, or at least a dedicated cable from a nearby substation.

    In such circumstances it would be reasonable to design "as if" part of the installation belonged to the DNO, it would have done in the recent past. 

     




    Exactly.  This is how designers deal with this in my experience.  With a transformer very local (on site), you can be sure that you are not double counting allowances with the DNO.  On tall buildings you could end up with some chunky submains otherwise.  

Reply

  • broadgage:

    In the case of a larger or more complex building network, then IMO engineering judgement may be applied to justify a greater voltage drop. A large building network implies either an on site substation, or at least a dedicated cable from a nearby substation.

    In such circumstances it would be reasonable to design "as if" part of the installation belonged to the DNO, it would have done in the recent past. 

     




    Exactly.  This is how designers deal with this in my experience.  With a transformer very local (on site), you can be sure that you are not double counting allowances with the DNO.  On tall buildings you could end up with some chunky submains otherwise.  

Children
No Data