Is an NE fault immedately dangerous, potentially dangerous, or just extremely annoying if it causes nuisance tripping ?
I would say 'potentially dangerous' in that it needs a second fault (possibly two further faults) to be dangerous. However it is still a fault that should be rectified, particularly as it can give rise to a problem that may not be protected against..
Dangerous, requiring immediate attention when the users of the installation have already twice reported receiving electric shocks from an appliance and when using a mixer shower over a plastic bath.
If it had been a TT installation rather than TNCS things could have been a lot more lively.
Is an NE fault immedately dangerous, potentially dangerous, or just extremely annoying if it causes nuisance tripping ?
I would say 'potentially dangerous' in that it needs a second fault (possibly two further faults) to be dangerous. However it is still a fault that should be rectified, particularly as it can give rise to a problem that may not be protected against..
Dangerous, requiring immediate attention when the users of the installation have already twice reported receiving electric shocks from an appliance and when using a mixer shower over a plastic bath.
If it had been a TT installation rather than TNCS things could have been a lot more lively.
