This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Minimum values of insulation resistance

What is the science behind the 1 MOhm minimum insulation resistance? What is the basis for this particular value?
Parents

  • AJJewsbury:

    Just in case it adds anything, I've been looking back over the old regs. As far as I can tell the requirement for insulation testing started with the 3rd Ed in 1897 - then the limit was 10MΩ divided by the maximum demand of the installation in amps.


    In the 4th Ed of 1903 it changed to 30MΩ divided by the number of 'points'.


    By the 8th Ed of 1924 it became 25MΩ divided by the number of points, but with the added proviso that 1MΩ for the entire installation was acceptable even if the formula produced a higher number.


    In the 10th Ed of 1934 the demand was for 100MΩ divided by the the number of points for the fixed wiring alone (before light fittings etc were connected) and 50MΩ divided by the number of points for the completed installation (without appliances), but again that entire installations need not exceed 1MΩ.


    The 12th just added the proviso that readings below 0.5MΩ weren't acceptable because instruments of the time wouldn't be able to provide 500V into resistances that low.


    By the 13th Ed (1955) it was 50MΩ divided by the number of points generally, but 12.5MΩ divided by the number of points if PVC-insulated cables used. Again 1MΩ for entire installation was acceptable.


    The 14th (1966) made the requirement a flat 1MΩ but large installations could be sub-divided into groups of not less than 50 outlets.


    The 16th introduced wording similar to what we have today (main switchboard and each distribution circuit tested separately) but the limit was reduced to 0.5MΩ


    And the 17th introduced what we have today - main switchboard and each distribution circuit tested separately - and the limit restored to 1MΩ


      - Andy.




    Thanks Andy for that interesting history.


    Whoever was writing the 16th edition must have had some very good reason that he could justify to reduce the minimum to 0.5MOhm .


    Similarly, whoever was writing the 17th edition must have had some very good reason that he could justify to increase the minimum requirement to 1MOhm.


    This 1MOhm does not seem to fit well with the threshold of reaction of IEC/TR 60479-1 or threshold of perception of BS EN 61140 values of 0.5mA ac and 2mA dc for the limitation of steady-state touch current.


    So why this very elusive value of 1MOhm for minimum insulation resistance?



     

Reply

  • AJJewsbury:

    Just in case it adds anything, I've been looking back over the old regs. As far as I can tell the requirement for insulation testing started with the 3rd Ed in 1897 - then the limit was 10MΩ divided by the maximum demand of the installation in amps.


    In the 4th Ed of 1903 it changed to 30MΩ divided by the number of 'points'.


    By the 8th Ed of 1924 it became 25MΩ divided by the number of points, but with the added proviso that 1MΩ for the entire installation was acceptable even if the formula produced a higher number.


    In the 10th Ed of 1934 the demand was for 100MΩ divided by the the number of points for the fixed wiring alone (before light fittings etc were connected) and 50MΩ divided by the number of points for the completed installation (without appliances), but again that entire installations need not exceed 1MΩ.


    The 12th just added the proviso that readings below 0.5MΩ weren't acceptable because instruments of the time wouldn't be able to provide 500V into resistances that low.


    By the 13th Ed (1955) it was 50MΩ divided by the number of points generally, but 12.5MΩ divided by the number of points if PVC-insulated cables used. Again 1MΩ for entire installation was acceptable.


    The 14th (1966) made the requirement a flat 1MΩ but large installations could be sub-divided into groups of not less than 50 outlets.


    The 16th introduced wording similar to what we have today (main switchboard and each distribution circuit tested separately) but the limit was reduced to 0.5MΩ


    And the 17th introduced what we have today - main switchboard and each distribution circuit tested separately - and the limit restored to 1MΩ


      - Andy.




    Thanks Andy for that interesting history.


    Whoever was writing the 16th edition must have had some very good reason that he could justify to reduce the minimum to 0.5MOhm .


    Similarly, whoever was writing the 17th edition must have had some very good reason that he could justify to increase the minimum requirement to 1MOhm.


    This 1MOhm does not seem to fit well with the threshold of reaction of IEC/TR 60479-1 or threshold of perception of BS EN 61140 values of 0.5mA ac and 2mA dc for the limitation of steady-state touch current.


    So why this very elusive value of 1MOhm for minimum insulation resistance?



     

Children
No Data