This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Wifi? Is it illegally illegal to post for a wifi problem on here????

Hi all,


Hope everyone's coping well!! 


OK, I bought an amazing security camera... unbelievably amazing for... just under £20! It does everything like, day and night vision, (only turn off the infrared thing as I am using an indoor security camera to cover the outside and if you have that selected it'll show up as some 10 spotlights reflecting back from the double glazing), that is also amazing! You can speak, and listen via it, and it'll record 24/7 via a micro 32GB SD card and it wipes the first on when it's full it also records to the 'cloud', (wherever that is... I guess I'll find it - eventually?).


You can watch it on anything anywhere and it's a plug and play system, with a little inputting... ANYWAYS, yes... it's fantastic and it's called a NEOS Smartcam, ( it's also known under a few differnt names as well).


So, all is good, yeah? Well... not quite. You see it needs a wifi connection. Down here, in my 'office' it's FAB but when I site it in my bedroom window, to cover the close, the wifi is hardly present.


I have a BT wifi unit, (a socket that connects to the router and an outlet for my digi TalkTalk box). BUT, when I use another BT system, that sends my wifi around the wiring... it just won't work and I think it may clash with the one feeding TT's box???


So, what's the best way to get wifi in the bedroom? 


I've looked and looked around and I don't like 'extenders'... or something that sends MORE wifi around the house, albeit 'directional'... so peep's what to do? 


I could use an internet cable but the camera doesn't have any attachment for it to plug into so there would need to be a 'device' / something, that would emit the wifi.


OK, sorry for the looooong post, hopefully someone, as I KNOW - you're all very clever lads, (and lassessess ?), out there!!


regards... Tom



Parents

  • mapj1:

    Putting it as pithily as the auto-censor on the bulletin boards permit, the scares about masts for 5g base stations are a load of claptrap.


    They are indeed small radio transmitters in 5 devices , much as there are in any mobile phone, but unless you intend to climb the mast and eat your packed lunch up there, by far the largest exposure comes from the device you or the chap next to you is holding - simply because the top of the mast is much further away, by a factor of hundreds, and the initial transmit power is comparable at both ends and can be imagined as spreading out spherically over an ever increasing area - and becoming consequently more and more thinly spread - indeed this is why you need so many base stations - the signal at these higher frequencies falls off so fast with distance as to be  below the limit of detection after some hundreds of metres. .

    Now it is quite true that for very good health reasons it is not sensible to spend the day with a 'phone' clapped to your head, or staring at your fondle-slab or whatever, but over-heating from radio waves is way down the list of possible side effects, longg after eye strain, neck ache, and possible obesity from lack of exercise and fresh air.

    At very high power levels other effects kick, in but that is not true of domestic devices that radiate a small fraction of a watt, those of us with a professional involvement do start to take care some where between 10 and 100 watts;




    Hello Mike, AH, I think it was you that posted about 5G. 


    So, that sounds like good advice... well said!!


    regards... Tom 


     

Reply

  • mapj1:

    Putting it as pithily as the auto-censor on the bulletin boards permit, the scares about masts for 5g base stations are a load of claptrap.


    They are indeed small radio transmitters in 5 devices , much as there are in any mobile phone, but unless you intend to climb the mast and eat your packed lunch up there, by far the largest exposure comes from the device you or the chap next to you is holding - simply because the top of the mast is much further away, by a factor of hundreds, and the initial transmit power is comparable at both ends and can be imagined as spreading out spherically over an ever increasing area - and becoming consequently more and more thinly spread - indeed this is why you need so many base stations - the signal at these higher frequencies falls off so fast with distance as to be  below the limit of detection after some hundreds of metres. .

    Now it is quite true that for very good health reasons it is not sensible to spend the day with a 'phone' clapped to your head, or staring at your fondle-slab or whatever, but over-heating from radio waves is way down the list of possible side effects, longg after eye strain, neck ache, and possible obesity from lack of exercise and fresh air.

    At very high power levels other effects kick, in but that is not true of domestic devices that radiate a small fraction of a watt, those of us with a professional involvement do start to take care some where between 10 and 100 watts;




    Hello Mike, AH, I think it was you that posted about 5G. 


    So, that sounds like good advice... well said!!


    regards... Tom 


     

Children
No Data