This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Obvious departures from the regulations at first glance at a new consumer unit.

I was asked to give an EICR on an domestic property which is to be placed on the market (part P applicable). I found that a builder as part of the other renovation work, (new doors, windows and kitchen etc.) has carried out the installation of a new metal consumer unit. On first opening this dual RCD unit, the 2 lighting circuits were on one R.C.D., and the 2 final ring circuits on the other R.C.D,, it was obvious also, that some wires to the new CB's were short and not lengthened, resulting in a bird's nest at the M.C.B.''s.


Plainly, a qualified electrician hadn't carried out the work. What would the readers as registered electricians have done ?. 1. Walk away. 2. Propose to have an E.I.C.R. carried out (UNSATISFACTORY), then carry out the rectification work and issue MWC's.3. Rectify the obvious departures, issue M.W.C.'s and then issue a SATISFACTORY E.I.C.R. 


Jaymack
Parents
  • Sorry, I should have have said that there are 8 circuits involved here, not just a lighting circuit for downstairs and another for upstairs, ditto for the 13A sockets. The only reason I can think of behind the irrational mix, was that the cables were simply too short and should have been lengthened; this is a basic departure from the regulations.


    I am surprised and saddened, that there some who think that it is OK to have this arrangement on a dual RCD board. There were other departures 1. Loose fitting of a clamp to a water pipe for bonding. 2. No bond at the gas meter. 3. A 32A MCB for a radial circuit to a single, twin socket outlet.


    Jaymack
Reply
  • Sorry, I should have have said that there are 8 circuits involved here, not just a lighting circuit for downstairs and another for upstairs, ditto for the 13A sockets. The only reason I can think of behind the irrational mix, was that the cables were simply too short and should have been lengthened; this is a basic departure from the regulations.


    I am surprised and saddened, that there some who think that it is OK to have this arrangement on a dual RCD board. There were other departures 1. Loose fitting of a clamp to a water pipe for bonding. 2. No bond at the gas meter. 3. A 32A MCB for a radial circuit to a single, twin socket outlet.


    Jaymack
Children
No Data