This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

5 second disconnection times

Hi all


Something that I have always wondered about since I started doing electrical work.


The 0.4 and 5 second disconnection times. 0.4 makes sense as it is quick.

However 5 seconds still seems a long time for exposed conductive parts to remain live. When I first started, lighting circuits had a 5s time.

Now it's 0.4 for all circuits feeding socket outlets up to 63A but only for fixed equipment up to 32A. So any equipment over 32A can be 5s.

The reason given in collage was that it was portable equipment that can be picked up and gripped but fixed equipment can be pulled away from.

Previously, in 16th ed regs, the 0.4 was for socket outlets and circuits supplying equipment that can be hand held.

However, 5 seconds still seems a long time for exposed metalwork to be live. I know with a low impedance earth the voltage will be lower, but still.


The other thing is that even a distribution circuit that can have 5s dis time, on an earth fault, say in an armoured cable, all earthed metalwork can be live for the full 5 seconds, even hand held equipment on circuits with a 0.4s dis time. I realise that if the fault was on the actual item of equipment itself the voltage would be higher.


Any equipment, though, above 32A can still have a 5s dis time. I come across fixed equipment all the time that is above 32A. This equipment quite often has parts of it that can actually be gripped. When the body has electricity passing though it the muscles contract so it may be hard to pull away.

I've seen a video of three men pushing a tower hitting an overhead HV line. all three dropped down but their hands still gripped the scaffold poles.

I know were dealing with LV but the muscles still react the same.

Even showers could once have a 5s dis time and the only thing that has changed that is the regs for RCDs in rooms containing a bath or shower. It's still on a circuit that, without the RCD, allows 5s.


The fact that the regs have tightened up of what circuits can have 5s dis times shows that there is still a danger on 5s. Otherwise, why change them to 0.4s.


Any thoughts?



Parents
  • A1 to Q1.

    In UK T&E, (not Irish BTW)  the reduced CPC relative to L and N means that the touch voltage at the hot end of a faulty appliance could be rather more than half way up the local mains voltage, actually 2.5mm with 1.5mm CPC is pretty good  - try a 4mm socket radial or perhaps a 40A  electric shower on a 20m run of 10mm2 T & E with a CPC of 4mm2

    If you are in good contact with terra-firma earthed objects, like plumbing, this extra voltage may matter greatly.

    For this reason we had bathroom bonding - the assumption is that in other rooms like kitchens you are less likely to be wet and naked. Now we aim to achieve the same effect by fast ADS with an RCD, rather than EEBADS.


    In respect of the standards while there is a problem of quoting too much  with copyright for the doc itself, the concepts that underpin are not secret, and are not even original to the IEC actually,  and  as such can be discussed in a suitably tutorial  sort of way .


    V fault = Vsupply *(Rlive /(Rcpc +Rlive))



    230V supply.
    • 1.5 sqmm cable has 1.0 sqmm CPC   touch voltage on fault  becomes 138

    • 2.5 sqmm cable has 1.5 sqmm CPC   touch voltage on fault  becomes  144V

    • 4 sqmm cable has 1.5 sqmm CPC      touch voltage on fault  becomes  167V

    • 6 sqmm cable has 2.5 sqmm CPC  touch voltage on fault  becomes 162V

    • 10 sqmm cable has 4 sqmm CPC    touch voltage on fault  becomes  164V

    • 16 sqmm cable has 6 sqmm CPC  touch voltage on fault  becomes 167V


    All more than 120V...


    TT is not really much worse.




Reply
  • A1 to Q1.

    In UK T&E, (not Irish BTW)  the reduced CPC relative to L and N means that the touch voltage at the hot end of a faulty appliance could be rather more than half way up the local mains voltage, actually 2.5mm with 1.5mm CPC is pretty good  - try a 4mm socket radial or perhaps a 40A  electric shower on a 20m run of 10mm2 T & E with a CPC of 4mm2

    If you are in good contact with terra-firma earthed objects, like plumbing, this extra voltage may matter greatly.

    For this reason we had bathroom bonding - the assumption is that in other rooms like kitchens you are less likely to be wet and naked. Now we aim to achieve the same effect by fast ADS with an RCD, rather than EEBADS.


    In respect of the standards while there is a problem of quoting too much  with copyright for the doc itself, the concepts that underpin are not secret, and are not even original to the IEC actually,  and  as such can be discussed in a suitably tutorial  sort of way .


    V fault = Vsupply *(Rlive /(Rcpc +Rlive))



    230V supply.
    • 1.5 sqmm cable has 1.0 sqmm CPC   touch voltage on fault  becomes 138

    • 2.5 sqmm cable has 1.5 sqmm CPC   touch voltage on fault  becomes  144V

    • 4 sqmm cable has 1.5 sqmm CPC      touch voltage on fault  becomes  167V

    • 6 sqmm cable has 2.5 sqmm CPC  touch voltage on fault  becomes 162V

    • 10 sqmm cable has 4 sqmm CPC    touch voltage on fault  becomes  164V

    • 16 sqmm cable has 6 sqmm CPC  touch voltage on fault  becomes 167V


    All more than 120V...


    TT is not really much worse.




Children
No Data