davezawadi (David Stone):ProMbrooke
Your equation and results do not make sense, perhaps you would like to correct the error in your potential divider equation, obvious because increasing the conductor size from 2.5 to 4.0 mm LOWERS the touch voltage. I will leave the correction to the student.
This is key:
Notice the assumption of C=0.8, meaning that on circuits 32 amps and under it is assumed the voltage at the source could dip to 184 volts or 80% of nominal, or at least 90% of nominal if part of C comes from being inside a structure with metal enforcments connected to the MET.
davezawadi (David Stone):ProMbrooke
Your equation and results do not make sense, perhaps you would like to correct the error in your potential divider equation, obvious because increasing the conductor size from 2.5 to 4.0 mm LOWERS the touch voltage. I will leave the correction to the student.
This is key:
Notice the assumption of C=0.8, meaning that on circuits 32 amps and under it is assumed the voltage at the source could dip to 184 volts or 80% of nominal, or at least 90% of nominal if part of C comes from being inside a structure with metal enforcments connected to the MET.
We're about to take you to the IET registration website. Don't worry though, you'll be sent straight back to the community after completing the registration.
Continue to the IET registration site