This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Comms Rack Earthing and Bonding Question

Hi all


First post here, so apologies if I make any faux pas


I have a query on comms rack bonding (design stage).


- Two fibre services incoming to a big warehouse plus copper lines entering to a 42U cabinet in a small comms room on first floor of an attached little office area.

- MET is in the warehouse itself, in a corner (630A TPN supply).

- Fibre links from there to 5No. satellite racks (12U) on warehouse walls, 

- Satellite racks feed CCTV and WIFI in warehouse

- Light comms equipment install in the racks only.

- Furthest rack 240m away from MET (260m from comms room).


My question is about earthing and bonding to BSEN 50310.


Am I right in thinking that each satellite cab is to have a 4mm g/y to a brass earth block adjacent (secondary bonding busbar) and then connection onto a 16mm conductor back to a primary bonding busbar which in turn connects to the MET? Am finding the standard a little confusing. 42U to have a 16mm connection?


I see a table about sizing based on distance, but is that applicable?


Sorry if I am being dense, but finding it hard to understand. Help would be appreciated or direction to a simplified resource.


Regards


Muhammad







Parents
  • Within the comms room it will be possible and is sensible to bond everything together to a common earth - if you had a large hall of kit a mesh might be better, but  a few racks is scarcely that.

    Another rack 240m away is essentially out of the EMC zone , and you should assume that the earth voltages could be quite different on a microsecond scale - is it connected by fibre or by twisted pairs to the comms room? (In many ways if you can justify the outlay then fibre makes things much easier. ) Also relevant are the external signals coming in - yo uhave to imagine that they might be at different voltages ,and you do not want anything delicate to end up 'doing the splits' with one interface connected to something at a completely different voltage, The trick then is to marshall the in coming lines such that services are interconnected and therefore not able to be too far apart voltage-wise before they hit the expensive equipment.

    If you ever end up designing a nuclear bunker that means all in bound cables for antennas, network cables, power  and so forth have shielding armour that terminates on a common of access panel. For commercial situations the stresses are not so extreme, but the principles are very much the same - you are only trying to prevent overstress of the electronics, and more or less normal ADS.
Reply
  • Within the comms room it will be possible and is sensible to bond everything together to a common earth - if you had a large hall of kit a mesh might be better, but  a few racks is scarcely that.

    Another rack 240m away is essentially out of the EMC zone , and you should assume that the earth voltages could be quite different on a microsecond scale - is it connected by fibre or by twisted pairs to the comms room? (In many ways if you can justify the outlay then fibre makes things much easier. ) Also relevant are the external signals coming in - yo uhave to imagine that they might be at different voltages ,and you do not want anything delicate to end up 'doing the splits' with one interface connected to something at a completely different voltage, The trick then is to marshall the in coming lines such that services are interconnected and therefore not able to be too far apart voltage-wise before they hit the expensive equipment.

    If you ever end up designing a nuclear bunker that means all in bound cables for antennas, network cables, power  and so forth have shielding armour that terminates on a common of access panel. For commercial situations the stresses are not so extreme, but the principles are very much the same - you are only trying to prevent overstress of the electronics, and more or less normal ADS.
Children
No Data