Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 41 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 3595 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

EV charging provision as part of new build planning permission?

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
As per subject, I was asked this morning about the practicalities for EV provision by an electrician. Apparently, it has been stipulated as a condition of granting planning permission for some new build dwellings, so I asked for sight of this.


Whilst it is usual for the planning to seek comments from the water authority for sewage disposal, I doubt if the DNO has been consulted.


Has anyone else come across this?


Regards


BOD
Parents
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member

    Chris Pearson:




    davezawadi:

    Part of the reason was that huge political pressure was applied to not build nuclear because the proponents could not understand the difference between nuclear power and nuclear weapons.




    AFAIK, it is necessary to process the fuel for a bomb in a reactor, so the real reason for building power stations after WWII was to support the weapons programme. The fact that the heat could be turned into electricity was a bonus. Now, of course, we just need the power.


     



    Which is why we built Calder Hall and ran fuel cycles every year, to get enough Plutonium to keep the chaps at AWRE gainfully employed in producing the buckets of instant sunshine


    We haven't produced weapons grade plutonium for about 30 years


    Regards


    OMS
     

Reply
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member

    Chris Pearson:




    davezawadi:

    Part of the reason was that huge political pressure was applied to not build nuclear because the proponents could not understand the difference between nuclear power and nuclear weapons.




    AFAIK, it is necessary to process the fuel for a bomb in a reactor, so the real reason for building power stations after WWII was to support the weapons programme. The fact that the heat could be turned into electricity was a bonus. Now, of course, we just need the power.


     



    Which is why we built Calder Hall and ran fuel cycles every year, to get enough Plutonium to keep the chaps at AWRE gainfully employed in producing the buckets of instant sunshine


    We haven't produced weapons grade plutonium for about 30 years


    Regards


    OMS
     

Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines