This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

80% pay

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
This does raise a few points! I can see both sides having spent 13 years as an employee interspersed with being self-employed out of my total of 46 years working.

My understanding is:

I'd say most business use an accountant to minimise their tax bill by claiming for office items including the new phone monthly rental, new lap top etc yet alone other things as transport costs including the new van, all of which are not available to the employed.

I suspect also that quite a few jobs that are paid in cash, are not always declared in full.

Purchase of tools and equipment also tends to be a call made on reducing taxable income when there is a profit to be reduced.

The consequence I see is that the tax paid averaged over the last three years will be lower and subsequently, any "Government" pay given out in June will be considerably less than the living standards some have got used to............... One "perk" is that they can still continue earning whereas to qualify for the employee 80%, they must be furloughed. 

Secondly, those small or sole traders fronted with a Ltd company are employees, so does the Ltd company have to pay themselves as per the 80% scheme in place for employees? The directors of those companies are not self employed, they also take dividends to reduce tax, so have they excluded themselves from yesterday's announcement? Yet alone to be furloughed, they must not do any work at all for their employer, ie their own business?


Regards


BOD
Parents

  • Chris Pearson:

    And then, what is the prognosis for a patient who is on ventilation? The figure for recovery (of hospital patients) published in worldometers.info is 4% of "closed" cases in UK. Those stats seem to show that 99% of cases have been "mild" as opposed to "serious or critical". So it appears that 135 lives at most have been saved so far in hospitals.




    I must correct the above data. It seems that worldometers.info has not kept up to date.


    Proper audit data are here.


    The headline stats are 50% mortality rate of patients who have been discharged from ITU with only 33% survival if full ventilation has been required. 2621 admissions to ITU by Friday 3 April. So if the chances of survival don't change, that's 1300 lives saved in ITU. Of course there will have been thousands more for whom admission to ITU may have been avoided. ?

     

Reply

  • Chris Pearson:

    And then, what is the prognosis for a patient who is on ventilation? The figure for recovery (of hospital patients) published in worldometers.info is 4% of "closed" cases in UK. Those stats seem to show that 99% of cases have been "mild" as opposed to "serious or critical". So it appears that 135 lives at most have been saved so far in hospitals.




    I must correct the above data. It seems that worldometers.info has not kept up to date.


    Proper audit data are here.


    The headline stats are 50% mortality rate of patients who have been discharged from ITU with only 33% survival if full ventilation has been required. 2621 admissions to ITU by Friday 3 April. So if the chances of survival don't change, that's 1300 lives saved in ITU. Of course there will have been thousands more for whom admission to ITU may have been avoided. ?

     

Children
No Data