Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 23 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 5109 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

TNCS Condition

lyledunn
f51b9c4342acb17854276ea4c05938ae-huge-7ffcd357-6382-406d-ba19-012100635c9e.jpg

Perhaps you can shed some light on this condition for TNCS systems in the Irish Rules. I can only see that as RE decreases RB becomes more onerous but to be honest I am not really getting the essence.
Parents
  • 0

    I did the sums using RB=20 and RE=100



    OK with you so far - Rb/Re gives 0.2 which is less than the R.H.S - so is acceptable.


    Then I decided that the other side of the equation always stays the same, so RB/RE has to greater than or equal to 0.2631ohms,



    Again agreed (I used 230V rather than 240 and so got 0.27' but that's not significant)


    so if RB is 20 ohms RE cannot be more than 5.26 ohms.



    Now you've lost me - we started out with Re = 100 Ohms (with Rb = 20).


       - Andy.
Reply
  • 0

    I did the sums using RB=20 and RE=100



    OK with you so far - Rb/Re gives 0.2 which is less than the R.H.S - so is acceptable.


    Then I decided that the other side of the equation always stays the same, so RB/RE has to greater than or equal to 0.2631ohms,



    Again agreed (I used 230V rather than 240 and so got 0.27' but that's not significant)


    so if RB is 20 ohms RE cannot be more than 5.26 ohms.



    Now you've lost me - we started out with Re = 100 Ohms (with Rb = 20).


       - Andy.
Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines