The IET is carrying out some important updates between 17-30 April and all of our websites will be view only. For more information, read this Announcement

Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 185 replies
  • Subscribers 33 subscribers
  • Views 22908 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

EV CHARGING EQUIPMENT

John Peckham
I am hearing from my network of contractors, that have actually read the new 722, that they have been asking charging equipment manufactures for documentary proof to comply with Note 5 of 722.411.4.


They are getting knocked back for asking or in one case a Declaration that says the particular device complies with BS 7671. I think that is wrong to declare that as BS 7671 is an installation safety standard and not a product standard. I believe that as a minimum the equipment must comply with the Low Voltage Directive and be CE marked. I also believe that manufacturers have to issue a Declaration of Conformity. 


BS 7671 722 has numerous references to the various standards required such as BS EN 61851 that the equipment must comply with. I am thinking it may be illegal to offer the sale of equipment that does not comply with the Low Voltage Directive and is not CE marked?


I am hoping the countries top man of equipment safety standards, Paul Skyrme , sees this post and will come on and give us his expert view?


Has any forum member asked for a Declaration of Conformity from EV charging equipment manufacturers and received one?
Parents
  • 0

    AJJewsbury:




    Hence the preference for a dedicated EV charging circuit, even if it is only a 13-amp socket?





    But BS 7671's idea of a circuit considers only overcurrent protective devices, not RCDs - so you could have a separate circuit for the EV point but still have the upstream RCD shared with other circuits (e.g. as in split load CUs).


    Yes but ...

    722.531.2.101 "... each charging point shall be protected by its own RCD ..."


    If the circuit is in say a garage, it might be clipped direct, in trunking, or in conduit, so no need for the RCD to be in the CU. If the EVCP is on the side of a house and the cable is buried in plaster, it will need an upstream RCD. If that is not an RCBO, there will have to be another one locally.

Reply
  • 0

    AJJewsbury:




    Hence the preference for a dedicated EV charging circuit, even if it is only a 13-amp socket?





    But BS 7671's idea of a circuit considers only overcurrent protective devices, not RCDs - so you could have a separate circuit for the EV point but still have the upstream RCD shared with other circuits (e.g. as in split load CUs).


    Yes but ...

    722.531.2.101 "... each charging point shall be protected by its own RCD ..."


    If the circuit is in say a garage, it might be clipped direct, in trunking, or in conduit, so no need for the RCD to be in the CU. If the EVCP is on the side of a house and the cable is buried in plaster, it will need an upstream RCD. If that is not an RCBO, there will have to be another one locally.

Children
No Data

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines