This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

EV CHARGING EQUIPMENT

I am hearing from my network of contractors, that have actually read the new 722, that they have been asking charging equipment manufactures for documentary proof to comply with Note 5 of 722.411.4.


They are getting knocked back for asking or in one case a Declaration that says the particular device complies with BS 7671. I think that is wrong to declare that as BS 7671 is an installation safety standard and not a product standard. I believe that as a minimum the equipment must comply with the Low Voltage Directive and be CE marked. I also believe that manufacturers have to issue a Declaration of Conformity. 


BS 7671 722 has numerous references to the various standards required such as BS EN 61851 that the equipment must comply with. I am thinking it may be illegal to offer the sale of equipment that does not comply with the Low Voltage Directive and is not CE marked?


I am hoping the countries top man of equipment safety standards, Paul Skyrme , sees this post and will come on and give us his expert view?


Has any forum member asked for a Declaration of Conformity from EV charging equipment manufacturers and received one?
Parents
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    The charge point install I was referring to went fine from a customer perspective, but was perhaps a bit suspect from a standards and compliance one. The chap put it where he was asked to and swept up afterwards but he got into a bit of a muddle on diversity calculations, pulled the main fuse without PPE or resealing, and I got the general feeling he was following a script without much understanding. Certainly it was the kind of arrangement where he scribbled down some test results and then the certificates arrive 3 months later signed by someone who'd never been within 50 miles of the installation.
Reply
  • Former Community Member
    0 Former Community Member
    The charge point install I was referring to went fine from a customer perspective, but was perhaps a bit suspect from a standards and compliance one. The chap put it where he was asked to and swept up afterwards but he got into a bit of a muddle on diversity calculations, pulled the main fuse without PPE or resealing, and I got the general feeling he was following a script without much understanding. Certainly it was the kind of arrangement where he scribbled down some test results and then the certificates arrive 3 months later signed by someone who'd never been within 50 miles of the installation.
Children
No Data