This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

EV CHARGING EQUIPMENT

I am hearing from my network of contractors, that have actually read the new 722, that they have been asking charging equipment manufactures for documentary proof to comply with Note 5 of 722.411.4.


They are getting knocked back for asking or in one case a Declaration that says the particular device complies with BS 7671. I think that is wrong to declare that as BS 7671 is an installation safety standard and not a product standard. I believe that as a minimum the equipment must comply with the Low Voltage Directive and be CE marked. I also believe that manufacturers have to issue a Declaration of Conformity. 


BS 7671 722 has numerous references to the various standards required such as BS EN 61851 that the equipment must comply with. I am thinking it may be illegal to offer the sale of equipment that does not comply with the Low Voltage Directive and is not CE marked?


I am hoping the countries top man of equipment safety standards, Paul Skyrme , sees this post and will come on and give us his expert view?


Has any forum member asked for a Declaration of Conformity from EV charging equipment manufacturers and received one?
Parents
  • David


    I am surprised that a Type AC will still trip at 150mA with a 100mA of DC injected. I will have a go at measuring the DC injection on my old Robin 4120DL loop tester. It locks up RCDs but not RCBOs. It would suggest that RCBOs have a higher DC immunity than RCDs. My DC clamp meter only goes down to 100mA so my test may not indicate anything.
Reply
  • David


    I am surprised that a Type AC will still trip at 150mA with a 100mA of DC injected. I will have a go at measuring the DC injection on my old Robin 4120DL loop tester. It locks up RCDs but not RCBOs. It would suggest that RCBOs have a higher DC immunity than RCDs. My DC clamp meter only goes down to 100mA so my test may not indicate anything.
Children
No Data