Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 185 replies
  • Subscribers 28 subscribers
  • Views 15441 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

EV CHARGING EQUIPMENT

John Peckham
I am hearing from my network of contractors, that have actually read the new 722, that they have been asking charging equipment manufactures for documentary proof to comply with Note 5 of 722.411.4.


They are getting knocked back for asking or in one case a Declaration that says the particular device complies with BS 7671. I think that is wrong to declare that as BS 7671 is an installation safety standard and not a product standard. I believe that as a minimum the equipment must comply with the Low Voltage Directive and be CE marked. I also believe that manufacturers have to issue a Declaration of Conformity. 


BS 7671 722 has numerous references to the various standards required such as BS EN 61851 that the equipment must comply with. I am thinking it may be illegal to offer the sale of equipment that does not comply with the Low Voltage Directive and is not CE marked?


I am hoping the countries top man of equipment safety standards, Paul Skyrme , sees this post and will come on and give us his expert view?


Has any forum member asked for a Declaration of Conformity from EV charging equipment manufacturers and received one?
  • 0

    OlympusMons:

    Hi Graham, I don't own a copy of bs1363-2 and was unaware of clause 7.1(b). However my point was that the quoted reg is unclear. If it meant that the socket outlet should have bs1363/EV printed on its rear by the OEM, then that is what it should say. not "a socket outlet complying with bs1363-2 marked "EV" on its rear"




    I guess whatever the case, anything that's written could be misinterpreted. The wording of 722.55.101.0.201.1 has been in place since 2018 for the 18th Edition, although there was an opportunity for everyone to comment on it for quite some period back in October 2019, when Amendment 1 DPC was in place.


     




    The same reg says an additional label shall be provided on the "front face" which is what I was referring to at the start of the above post. It does say "except where there is no possibility of confusion" and I apologise if my post caused any.




    Only trying to be helpful ... you didn't cause offence.


    Anyway, if you want one (although the IET CoP recommends only Mode 3 and Mode 4 charging facilities are installed in general) this is an example of one that is labelled front and back : https://www.screwfix.com/p/masterplug-1-port-2-3kw-mode-2-uk-3-pin-plug-mode-2-domestic-ev-charging-station/512gv

  • 0
    Lawnmower, caravan, mobile fish and chip shop? Who knows what might be connected!


    Maybe the requirements for all outdoor sockets should be more stringent.


    Andy B.
  • 0
    Do BG make a Type A C16 RCBO?


    I could  not find any for sale several weeks ago and bought Hager instead.


     Andy B.
  • 0

    Chris Pearson:






    ...

    But we are getting away from JP's OP. ..




     



    Apologies John. 

     

  • 0

    Sparkingchip:

    Lawnmower, caravan, mobile fish and chip shop? Who knows what might be connected!


    Maybe the requirements for all outdoor sockets should be more stringent.


    Andy B.



    I thought all that was supposed to have been sorted in the 16th Edition. 

     

  • 0

    OlympusMons:




    Chris Pearson:






    ...

    But we are getting away from JP's OP. ..




     



    Apologies John. 

     


     




    Ah! But! I am trying to steer it back around.


    Does anyone have one of those Masterplug 13-amp EV charging stations to hand or fixed to the front wall of their house or somewhere similar? If so please go and dismantle it and post a picture of where the socket is marked EV on its rear.


    If if I see one of these whilst undertaking the preparation of an EICR I will definitely be taking it apart to have a look inside it.


    Andy Betteridge 

  • 0
    Simon B


    Plugs and sockets are for some strange reason excluded from the LVD.
  • 0

    John Peckham:

    Simon B


    Plugs and sockets are for some strange reason excluded from the LVD. 




    But, at least "standard" plugs and socket-outlets are covered by the Plugs and Sockets (Safety) Regulations 1994.

  • 0
    The 1 port 2.3 kW mode 2 uk 3 pin plug electric vehicle charging station is not a complicated bit of equipment.


    Indeed it is an IP rated outdoor double accessory box with a single socket in one side and a single pole C16 RCBO providing Type AC RCD and overload protection in the other side.


    Straight away this raises some potential questions, so like JP some people thought they would ask the manufacturer for guidance, some of them did this through the S’fix website, so we can see their question and the answer from the manufacturer.

    For example:

    I thought that anything to do with EV Charging required a Type A RCD or RCBO




    This does not comply with current EV Charging BS 7671 Wiring Regulations

    24 Jan 2020

    by
    BoomSparky,

    Billericay

    , Electrician



    Hi BoomSparky,

    The current regulations do require that there be at least a Type A device `at some point from the distribution board to the outlet' protecting an EV charging installation, it does _not_ specify that this needs to be immediately at the socket.

    5 Feb 2020

    by 
    Nexus Technical Team,



    So let’s just refer to the Code of Practice (mine is the second edition):

    4678cea3d67782ebb6a64b9f62946772-huge-b294b8c6-c3ca-4745-988d-33ea0c71153b.jpg



  • 0
    So if you have a nice shiny new M’plug EV charging station attached to the wall of the house just make sure that the electrician that installed it also installed a 30 mA double pole type A RCD in the consumer unit or circuit upstream of it, because apparently that single pole type AC RCBO is not fit for purpose.


    Helpful guidance from the manufacturer?


    Being single pole it doesn’t even count as an emergency switch and there’s no discrimination with the RCD that is required upfront of it, it fails to pass inspection on any points at all.


    It’s going to take twenty five minutes to write the observations up on an EICR.


    Andy Betteridge

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines