This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Metal - clad buildings and the confused forum member.

One of the members has queried ESQCR bonding/earthing PME requirements for the above. So its worth spending a little time putting across the companies requirements. Where metal-clad buildings incorporate a steel-frame that utilises steel vertical beams that are within the foundations, the steel frame will provide a good connection with the earth which will effectively limit the earth potential rise.

A PME service may be provided to a metal-clad building provided the following criteria are satisfied:


1. The metal cladding is bonded to the steel-frame.

2. The supply is either three-phase with less than 40% unbalance or the supply is single - phase and the frame to earth impedance is les than 20ohms.

Regards, UKPN?

Parents
  • Sparkingchip:

    If all the units are being built together, then care is taken to balance the loads and a copper earthing tape that is also sized to handle stray current is run buried as a foundation earth between the main earth terminals in each of the separate units, then the risks from lost neutrals and diverted neutral currents can be reduced can’t they?


    Or is that an over simplification?


    If you had N-PE links in each unit then you'd still have diverted N currents flowing through the structure - possibly reduced by having the earthing tape in parallel, but possibly still quite substantial. Years ago I worked in an office in one unit of a multiple block with conventional individual PME supplies - in one corner images on CRT monitors would always 'wobble' - it was only years later I realised that they were between our intake position and next door's and diverted N currents running through the structure were likely to blame. It's hard to balance a supply when different users feel free to turns thing on and off to please themselves.


    Current DNO policy of supplying each unit using split-con from a single point outside where N and PE are split is probably an easier and more thorough solution - especially now other services are likely to be non-metallic.


       - Andy.


Reply
  • Sparkingchip:

    If all the units are being built together, then care is taken to balance the loads and a copper earthing tape that is also sized to handle stray current is run buried as a foundation earth between the main earth terminals in each of the separate units, then the risks from lost neutrals and diverted neutral currents can be reduced can’t they?


    Or is that an over simplification?


    If you had N-PE links in each unit then you'd still have diverted N currents flowing through the structure - possibly reduced by having the earthing tape in parallel, but possibly still quite substantial. Years ago I worked in an office in one unit of a multiple block with conventional individual PME supplies - in one corner images on CRT monitors would always 'wobble' - it was only years later I realised that they were between our intake position and next door's and diverted N currents running through the structure were likely to blame. It's hard to balance a supply when different users feel free to turns thing on and off to please themselves.


    Current DNO policy of supplying each unit using split-con from a single point outside where N and PE are split is probably an easier and more thorough solution - especially now other services are likely to be non-metallic.


       - Andy.


Children
No Data