The IET is carrying out some important updates between 17-30 April and all of our websites will be view only. For more information, read this Announcement
mapj1:
Though I'd have to say I do not like it - as for a long time we used to put put 400V (or 415V or 440V depending who did it) on boxes with 3 phases where the phase to phase voltage was 400, so you could get similar labels on both cases, and possible confusion in an old building.
I do prefer to see the star/delta voltages so 230/400 or 400/690 or 690/1200 (this last not seen in the UK to my knowledge, only seen once in a large German Factory myself, along with Achtung Hochspannung Lebensgefahr labels ) as it is less ambiguous, though I agree it is not what the modern standards request.
mapj1
I take it those labels where the phase to phase voltage was 400 were being applied as part of a client request and not a requirement of some BS standard ?
mapj1:
Though I'd have to say I do not like it - as for a long time we used to put put 400V (or 415V or 440V depending who did it) on boxes with 3 phases where the phase to phase voltage was 400, so you could get similar labels on both cases, and possible confusion in an old building.
I do prefer to see the star/delta voltages so 230/400 or 400/690 or 690/1200 (this last not seen in the UK to my knowledge, only seen once in a large German Factory myself, along with Achtung Hochspannung Lebensgefahr labels ) as it is less ambiguous, though I agree it is not what the modern standards request.
mapj1
I take it those labels where the phase to phase voltage was 400 were being applied as part of a client request and not a requirement of some BS standard ?
We're making some changes behind the scenes to deliver a better experience for our members and customers. Posting and interactions are paused. Thank you for your patience and see you soon!
For more information, please read this announcement