This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

TT Earthing Systems - Interest by New Zealand

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
I am the chair of a Standards NZ committee charged with the production of a technical report to the NZ regulator regarding the possible use of the TT earthing system in NZ.   Currently, NZ uses the MEN earthing system (as does Australia), being similar to the PME earthing system used in the UK but with an earth electrode being required in each electrical installation to assist in keeping the voltage to earth of the neutral conductor of the LV reticulation close to zero.   Otherwise the MEN system is TN-C-S and relies on the PEN conductor as a return path to clear earth faults by the operation of OCPDs.   The use of RCDs is now required for most sub-circuits to provide additional shock protection.  


As is well known, TN systems are not perfect and a broken or high impedance PEN conductor causes the livening of earthed and bonded surfaces, including the chassis of EVs when they are plugged in to EV charging equipment.   It is noted that the IET Wiring Rules do not permit the use of PME systems to supply EV charging equipment unless the voltage on earthed surfaces is held to a non-lethal value.  
 


Without going into further detail, the committee, in preparing a report, remains concerned about and seeks information on two possible problems.   


The first is how to attain at reasonable cost a TT earthing electrode system that does not exceed 100 ohms to earth in many NZ locations where the soil resistivity and the seasonal variation of this is high.   Does it cost a fortune to do this in the UK?    We have difficulty at many sites in reducing substation earthing mat and rod systems to less than 10 ohms and sometimes that is not achievable.




The second is how to be reasonably sure that the RCDs in any TT installation will be regularly tested every six months or so by the users of the installation?  RCDs are not perfect but are much more important safety devices when used in a TT installation than in a TN installation.   Therefore regular testing appears to be important to maintain safety.    With non-domestic installations this should not be a problem as their regular testing (by pushbutton) can be linked to annual building inspections or included in maintenance schedules.  However, how does the UK ensure - if it does - that the occupants of domestic TT installations regularly check the operation of their RCDs?   One sensible suggestion made by a committee member was that the regular RCD checking could be linked to the six-monthly call by our Fire and Emergency Service to check the batteries in fire alarms installed in houses.   That might prompt a few people to check their RCDs.    


 


Since I was intending to ask about the practicability of 100 ohm earth electrode systems in the UK, I thought that I should also enquire about the regular testing of RCDs in domestic installations.  


I should be grateful for any comments or suggestions.

 

P M R Browne BE(Elect) FIET FENZ

Parents
  • I am not aware of any official figures for the fraction of RCDs that get tested as frequently as they should, anecdotally, in many cases they often do not, but it does not seem to be a problem. There are figures from surveys for fire alarm tests, which are probably similar, and they too show a general apathy. Govt safety campaigns to encourage users to press "test" when the clocks change to summer time seem to have had some success.  page 18 shows 25% of housholds have never tested their fire/smoke alarms


    For situations where RCD failure is a more serious risk, such as caravans and shore supplies to moored up boats, then the usual recommendation is that two RCDs are cascaded - so there is one at the source end, the caravan pitch or the mooring post,  and another in the load - i.e. within the caravan or boat. If the failure rate of any one is say 1%, then the chance of 2 independent RCD failures, and an un-noticed dangerous fault condition, is considered rare enough to be safe.

    On the same lines one or more 100mA delay RCD(s) at the head of an installation, and 30mA instant devices (RCBO or RCD )for final circuits are a 'belt and braces' solution, and is the common agricultural configuration (or a 300mA delay type covering  big sites with many out buildings)

    Domestic users in built up areas in the UK are probably mostly not  TT - new housing tends to be PME, and older housing stock is often TN-S (more than a third of  the 15 million or so houses in the UK predate the second world war, (and so does their hemp wrapped lead sheathed supply wiring!) UK housing stock data  Note that PME only came in in earnest from about 1970 onwards, before that TT and TN-S were the only normal options.

    Where TT is common is in rural areas where there are few buildings per transformer, and especially farms with livestock, but at the same time there is more land with each curtilage in such locations. For private earth electrodes, rods are common, though the regs permit more or less any shape of metal. rods are often 4ft (1.2m long) and we'd normally also bond to barns an so on with steel foundations, and this is often a significant bonus electrode.

    The supplier electrodes are supposed to be not more than 20 ohms, even for the lone pole-pig transformer in a field, and these are more likely to be bare wires or tapes buried at the foot of the supply poles, as unlike the typical home owner with a hammer or SDS drill,  the installers have access to a digger.

    Others with more experience will doubtless chip in shortly.


    regards

    Mike.
Reply
  • I am not aware of any official figures for the fraction of RCDs that get tested as frequently as they should, anecdotally, in many cases they often do not, but it does not seem to be a problem. There are figures from surveys for fire alarm tests, which are probably similar, and they too show a general apathy. Govt safety campaigns to encourage users to press "test" when the clocks change to summer time seem to have had some success.  page 18 shows 25% of housholds have never tested their fire/smoke alarms


    For situations where RCD failure is a more serious risk, such as caravans and shore supplies to moored up boats, then the usual recommendation is that two RCDs are cascaded - so there is one at the source end, the caravan pitch or the mooring post,  and another in the load - i.e. within the caravan or boat. If the failure rate of any one is say 1%, then the chance of 2 independent RCD failures, and an un-noticed dangerous fault condition, is considered rare enough to be safe.

    On the same lines one or more 100mA delay RCD(s) at the head of an installation, and 30mA instant devices (RCBO or RCD )for final circuits are a 'belt and braces' solution, and is the common agricultural configuration (or a 300mA delay type covering  big sites with many out buildings)

    Domestic users in built up areas in the UK are probably mostly not  TT - new housing tends to be PME, and older housing stock is often TN-S (more than a third of  the 15 million or so houses in the UK predate the second world war, (and so does their hemp wrapped lead sheathed supply wiring!) UK housing stock data  Note that PME only came in in earnest from about 1970 onwards, before that TT and TN-S were the only normal options.

    Where TT is common is in rural areas where there are few buildings per transformer, and especially farms with livestock, but at the same time there is more land with each curtilage in such locations. For private earth electrodes, rods are common, though the regs permit more or less any shape of metal. rods are often 4ft (1.2m long) and we'd normally also bond to barns an so on with steel foundations, and this is often a significant bonus electrode.

    The supplier electrodes are supposed to be not more than 20 ohms, even for the lone pole-pig transformer in a field, and these are more likely to be bare wires or tapes buried at the foot of the supply poles, as unlike the typical home owner with a hammer or SDS drill,  the installers have access to a digger.

    Others with more experience will doubtless chip in shortly.


    regards

    Mike.
Children
No Data