Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 73 replies
  • Subscribers 28 subscribers
  • Views 6503 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

TT Earthing Systems - Interest by New Zealand

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
I am the chair of a Standards NZ committee charged with the production of a technical report to the NZ regulator regarding the possible use of the TT earthing system in NZ.   Currently, NZ uses the MEN earthing system (as does Australia), being similar to the PME earthing system used in the UK but with an earth electrode being required in each electrical installation to assist in keeping the voltage to earth of the neutral conductor of the LV reticulation close to zero.   Otherwise the MEN system is TN-C-S and relies on the PEN conductor as a return path to clear earth faults by the operation of OCPDs.   The use of RCDs is now required for most sub-circuits to provide additional shock protection.  


As is well known, TN systems are not perfect and a broken or high impedance PEN conductor causes the livening of earthed and bonded surfaces, including the chassis of EVs when they are plugged in to EV charging equipment.   It is noted that the IET Wiring Rules do not permit the use of PME systems to supply EV charging equipment unless the voltage on earthed surfaces is held to a non-lethal value.  
 


Without going into further detail, the committee, in preparing a report, remains concerned about and seeks information on two possible problems.   


The first is how to attain at reasonable cost a TT earthing electrode system that does not exceed 100 ohms to earth in many NZ locations where the soil resistivity and the seasonal variation of this is high.   Does it cost a fortune to do this in the UK?    We have difficulty at many sites in reducing substation earthing mat and rod systems to less than 10 ohms and sometimes that is not achievable.




The second is how to be reasonably sure that the RCDs in any TT installation will be regularly tested every six months or so by the users of the installation?  RCDs are not perfect but are much more important safety devices when used in a TT installation than in a TN installation.   Therefore regular testing appears to be important to maintain safety.    With non-domestic installations this should not be a problem as their regular testing (by pushbutton) can be linked to annual building inspections or included in maintenance schedules.  However, how does the UK ensure - if it does - that the occupants of domestic TT installations regularly check the operation of their RCDs?   One sensible suggestion made by a committee member was that the regular RCD checking could be linked to the six-monthly call by our Fire and Emergency Service to check the batteries in fire alarms installed in houses.   That might prompt a few people to check their RCDs.    


 


Since I was intending to ask about the practicability of 100 ohm earth electrode systems in the UK, I thought that I should also enquire about the regular testing of RCDs in domestic installations.  


I should be grateful for any comments or suggestions.

 

P M R Browne BE(Elect) FIET FENZ

Parents
  • 0
    Sparkingchip:

    If we could easily remove dangerous voltages under fault conditions by simply knocking a metal rod into the ground it would have been done for over a hundred years, but it ain’t that simple.


    The question is, do you want to remove external influences on the earthing system within an electrical installation by relying on RCD protection to limit the effect of faults within the installation?


    Andy Betteridge 


    That's the nice thing about the Neutral Earthing Resistor approach - the PE remains at a safe voltage even during L-PE faults so while you have to depend on RCDs for disconnection, you don't depend on disconnection for shock protection. So the reliability of RCDs becomes somewhat less of an issue.


    Not much use for the OP though I guess as he won't have separate N and PE conductors in the distribution system.


       - Andy.


Reply
  • 0
    Sparkingchip:

    If we could easily remove dangerous voltages under fault conditions by simply knocking a metal rod into the ground it would have been done for over a hundred years, but it ain’t that simple.


    The question is, do you want to remove external influences on the earthing system within an electrical installation by relying on RCD protection to limit the effect of faults within the installation?


    Andy Betteridge 


    That's the nice thing about the Neutral Earthing Resistor approach - the PE remains at a safe voltage even during L-PE faults so while you have to depend on RCDs for disconnection, you don't depend on disconnection for shock protection. So the reliability of RCDs becomes somewhat less of an issue.


    Not much use for the OP though I guess as he won't have separate N and PE conductors in the distribution system.


       - Andy.


Children
No Data

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines