This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Armour bonding: Effect on cable rating

Hi all,

Inspired by this recent post (but not wanting to digress too far), the advantage of single-bonding cable is ostensibly the reduced circulating current in the armour and hence increased capacity in the line conductors... But can anyone tell me if there’s a way to quantify this benefit, without recalculating on first principles per IEC60287? Is it as “simple” as calculating the induced voltage using the method in the IET calculations book and then “adding back” the avoided current that would have otherwise ensued to the tabulating rating?

Also I most commonly see this applied at private transformer tails... but surely there they’re normally so short it’s of little benefit unless you’re mainly concerned with fault current rating?

Thanks as always.
Parents
  • I suspect Jam's is thinking of the case of single core armoured cables - where even non-magnetic armours can end up with some circulating currents if they form part of a loop. (I suppose it's a bit like a coreless 1:1 transformer with two copper windings).

       - Andy.
Reply
  • I suspect Jam's is thinking of the case of single core armoured cables - where even non-magnetic armours can end up with some circulating currents if they form part of a loop. (I suppose it's a bit like a coreless 1:1 transformer with two copper windings).

       - Andy.
Children
No Data