This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Zs, to test or calculate?

A large contractor working on our site have told me yesterday that it is their policy not to live test final circuits where they cannot use a plug? In order to reduce risk, they will now only calculate Zs, on circuits where they would have to open an enclosure, such as FCU's and light fittings.
The control measures we insist are in place, are IP2X equipment, GS38 leads, two man rule with second man having resus training, among others. So I feel the risk has been reduced to as low as reasonably practicable. An d my instinct tells me that a measured Zs reading must be more accurate than a calculated one, since it will include all parallel paths under test.
The contractor is happy to live test distribution circuits, so it seems they want to pick and choose.
They also state that this is how things are now, and have worked at many different sites, Cross Rail, Heathrow, various MOD sites etc, and that they al accept this as common practice.

I like some opinions to find out what's going on out there on other sites. 
Parents
  • I know an electrician, now retired, who didn’t have his NICEIC renewal signed of by his assessor around fifteen years ago after a few clashes.


    One clash was when his assessor suggested he bought a non-trip loop tester to get more accurate loop test results on RCD protected circuits and he replied saying he had a pencil.


    On a personal note I still have my original Robin multifunction installation tester, the main reason I “upgraded” by buying a Megger non-trip loop tester to accompany it was the increasing number of RCDs being installed, now it seems all these years later I could have stuck with the Robin and a pencil.


     Andy Betteridge
Reply
  • I know an electrician, now retired, who didn’t have his NICEIC renewal signed of by his assessor around fifteen years ago after a few clashes.


    One clash was when his assessor suggested he bought a non-trip loop tester to get more accurate loop test results on RCD protected circuits and he replied saying he had a pencil.


    On a personal note I still have my original Robin multifunction installation tester, the main reason I “upgraded” by buying a Megger non-trip loop tester to accompany it was the increasing number of RCDs being installed, now it seems all these years later I could have stuck with the Robin and a pencil.


     Andy Betteridge
Children
No Data