Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 58 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 12648 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Zs, to test or calculate?

Paul Brewerton
A large contractor working on our site have told me yesterday that it is their policy not to live test final circuits where they cannot use a plug? In order to reduce risk, they will now only calculate Zs, on circuits where they would have to open an enclosure, such as FCU's and light fittings.
The control measures we insist are in place, are IP2X equipment, GS38 leads, two man rule with second man having resus training, among others. So I feel the risk has been reduced to as low as reasonably practicable. An d my instinct tells me that a measured Zs reading must be more accurate than a calculated one, since it will include all parallel paths under test.
The contractor is happy to live test distribution circuits, so it seems they want to pick and choose.
They also state that this is how things are now, and have worked at many different sites, Cross Rail, Heathrow, various MOD sites etc, and that they al accept this as common practice.

I like some opinions to find out what's going on out there on other sites. 
Parents
  • 0
    Well maybe we should ask what it would be like if we (returned to in some cases) doing no tests at all. After all I suspect a lot of smaller  jobs are just  done and energised, and despite the lack of testing evidence, there are not a huge pile of dead bodies. And probably loads of installations were wired and energised in the past, regardless of the official regs view.

    Some countries (mostly looking to the 110V world) do almost no testing, live or dead, unless fault finding, instead relying on following prescribed methods of installation.

    That said it does not feel sensible, and there are some potentially dangerous cases, like the total supply reversal, or whole building off-earth  that would go un-noticed perhaps for some years until the fault the ADS was meant to prevent occurred, perhaps with fatal consequences.
Reply
  • 0
    Well maybe we should ask what it would be like if we (returned to in some cases) doing no tests at all. After all I suspect a lot of smaller  jobs are just  done and energised, and despite the lack of testing evidence, there are not a huge pile of dead bodies. And probably loads of installations were wired and energised in the past, regardless of the official regs view.

    Some countries (mostly looking to the 110V world) do almost no testing, live or dead, unless fault finding, instead relying on following prescribed methods of installation.

    That said it does not feel sensible, and there are some potentially dangerous cases, like the total supply reversal, or whole building off-earth  that would go un-noticed perhaps for some years until the fault the ADS was meant to prevent occurred, perhaps with fatal consequences.
Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines