mapj1:
If the advice only covers the case of the broken PEN just outside your own property it is missing a whole slew of more likely fault cases (there being probably one PEN joint that can fail to isolate only one property, and a multitude of joints that can fail in way that isolates more than one.).
I agree any attempt to use electrodes to hold the neutral down close to ground potential on both sides of a break in a current carrying circuit is pretty much futile.
Hence bosky bonds to plumbing and advice to TT to the local surface potential if it really matters.
Agreed on the "only covering PEN outside your property". However, if we're talking about a dwelling, using the full maximum demand perhaps errs on the side of caution by a good way. In addition, in a three-phase installation, the electrode resistance depends not only on the demand downstream of the PEN break, but also on the phase imbalance ...
With respect to "TT the local surface potential", the local surface potential drops off quite rapidly, perhaps even the difference between one side of a parked vehicle and the other ... forget about it's length ... and you've no idea where buried metalwork connected to PME is located ...
Shock risk is reduced if you're on certain surfaces (e.g. paved/tarmac) but not dependable (weather, ground saturation conditions, etc.)
Harry Macdonald:
I can't help thinking that the onus for detecting and making safe an installation following a PEN break should rest on the DNO not on every household that is being supplied. Especially with the advent of EV charging.
It should be quite easy to detect a break at the source substation simply by measuring the current in the neutral earth link
Or am I being too simple here.
We're about to take you to the IET registration website. Don't worry though, you'll be sent straight back to the community after completing the registration.
Continue to the IET registration site