Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 97 replies
  • Subscribers 29 subscribers
  • Views 10327 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

New EICR "unsatisfactory" - complete rewire required?!?

Former Community Member
Former Community Member
The lighting circuit has no CPC (earth), this is not uncommon in older houses. For that reason all light fittings are Class 2 i.e. plastic with no metal, and there is a clause in the tenancy agreement which forbids tampering with the light fittings (this is a house we own and rent out).


Previous EICRs did not even mention the lighting circuit because of the Class 2 fittings. I have just got a new EICR with an observation "lighting circuits have little or no earth" and classification code C1 ("Danger present, risk of injury, immediate remedial action required"). The overall assessment says "Unsatisfactory" with the comment "Needs updating to current regs". This can only be fixed by a complete rewire of the whole lighting circuit.


This is pointless, there are no earth connections in the plastic fittings.


Any thoughts? Many thanks.
Parents
  • 0
    The waffle continues, Where the topic writer has slipped up is he has trusted the agent to engage this amateur. Requirements as I see it are 5 years experience of testing, a Qualification of 2391 level and more. It should have been checked. The guy could have been one of these jack of all trades types who has latched on to this rip off of landlords. I cant see an experienced sparks doing this, sooner or later it would catch up with him. 

    As a previous poster has mentioned, report him, not to his trade body, because they all P in the same pot. No, go to the council/trading standards, and ask why, after repeated requests to explain how this is a "danger to life" which requires immediate remedy, the guy wont answer. Because he cant answer, it isnt dangerous. It wasnt dangerous in 1970, the cable hasnt deteriorated, all ins fitting, RCD. nothing has changed. 


    Regards, UKPN
Reply
  • 0
    The waffle continues, Where the topic writer has slipped up is he has trusted the agent to engage this amateur. Requirements as I see it are 5 years experience of testing, a Qualification of 2391 level and more. It should have been checked. The guy could have been one of these jack of all trades types who has latched on to this rip off of landlords. I cant see an experienced sparks doing this, sooner or later it would catch up with him. 

    As a previous poster has mentioned, report him, not to his trade body, because they all P in the same pot. No, go to the council/trading standards, and ask why, after repeated requests to explain how this is a "danger to life" which requires immediate remedy, the guy wont answer. Because he cant answer, it isnt dangerous. It wasnt dangerous in 1970, the cable hasnt deteriorated, all ins fitting, RCD. nothing has changed. 


    Regards, UKPN
Children
No Data

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines