Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 13 replies
  • Subscribers 27 subscribers
  • Views 880 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Very Odd Domestic consumer unit label

Alcomax
This could be the end of week quiz with a difference.....I have not got a clue on the answer.


This label was stuck on the front of a Domestic Consumer Unit .  The Consumer Unit was manufactured 1999 . It has a metal frame but a plastic cover, as per normal, standard Hager things at that time. The fronts were plastic for domestic purpose aesthetics I presume.


The questions are three fold
  1. Why are there boxes on the label to be ticked?

  • Why is the containment one ticked?

  • Is this a new tick box approach to Periodic Inspection?


*  edited for naughtiness


a48118b628b4686641b42726c65322b0-huge-containment.png



Parents
  • 0
    Funnily enough I've just come across one of those labels on a plastic CU - but with the 'No' box ticked for 'Containment to Amendment 3' ... the odd thing was that the CU was in a toilet block on a camp site which is as far as I can tell not a domestic (household) premises and so I'm wondering what the non-compliance was thought to be.


    It also struck me as a bit amateur to say Amendment 3 without saying which version of BS 7671 was being amended ... especially as we're currently only on AMD 1.


    All in all the phase 'stop that! ...  it's silly' comes to mind.


        - Andy.


Reply
  • 0
    Funnily enough I've just come across one of those labels on a plastic CU - but with the 'No' box ticked for 'Containment to Amendment 3' ... the odd thing was that the CU was in a toilet block on a camp site which is as far as I can tell not a domestic (household) premises and so I'm wondering what the non-compliance was thought to be.


    It also struck me as a bit amateur to say Amendment 3 without saying which version of BS 7671 was being amended ... especially as we're currently only on AMD 1.


    All in all the phase 'stop that! ...  it's silly' comes to mind.


        - Andy.


Children
No Data

Join us to get the best from IET EngX.

Joining EngX lets you personalise your experience so you stay up to date on the topics that interest you, plus you’ll be able to make connections who are looking to collaborate, exchange ideas and more.

Join us Not now

Community Rules & Guidelines