This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

SPDs AMD 2

Well, I'll kick off the debate on SPDs. Once again, the emphasis seems to be on domestic (we all, or virtually all of us live in a home of one sort or another) so are the proposals an improvement or not?
Parents
  • gkenyon:
    Chris Pearson:

    So do we do risk assessments for single dwelling units or not?


    "Except for single dwelling units ..."

     



    (I have raised a comment on the apparent typo.)

    "Stroke" is 100 % correct, and aligns with BS EN 62305-series.


    Graham, thank you. Every day is a learning day in this forum. ?


    IMHO the proposed 443.4.1 would be clearer if the exception for single dwelling units were removed. As it stands, if the risks are considered to be tolerable, no further action is required. Note 4 refers to determining the total value of loss in dwellings and then it is up to the occupier to compare the cost of SPD with the possible loss, i.e. to make a judgement as to whether the risks are tolerable. What does not seem logical is to exclude dwellings from the risk assessment because it may show that SPD is not justified. (Of course there is nothing to stop an occupier or his electrician doing a risk assessment in any case.)


    I also think that the difference between suburban and urban should be clarified though I struggle to determine where the boundary lies within this borough.


    I would also add that the more I think about it, the more I feel inclined to install SPD at home.


Reply
  • gkenyon:
    Chris Pearson:

    So do we do risk assessments for single dwelling units or not?


    "Except for single dwelling units ..."

     



    (I have raised a comment on the apparent typo.)

    "Stroke" is 100 % correct, and aligns with BS EN 62305-series.


    Graham, thank you. Every day is a learning day in this forum. ?


    IMHO the proposed 443.4.1 would be clearer if the exception for single dwelling units were removed. As it stands, if the risks are considered to be tolerable, no further action is required. Note 4 refers to determining the total value of loss in dwellings and then it is up to the occupier to compare the cost of SPD with the possible loss, i.e. to make a judgement as to whether the risks are tolerable. What does not seem logical is to exclude dwellings from the risk assessment because it may show that SPD is not justified. (Of course there is nothing to stop an occupier or his electrician doing a risk assessment in any case.)


    I also think that the difference between suburban and urban should be clarified though I struggle to determine where the boundary lies within this borough.


    I would also add that the more I think about it, the more I feel inclined to install SPD at home.


Children
No Data