This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Old design to 17th Edition updated to 18th - query on responsibilities

Hi All


Slightly convoluted question:


1. A design and build job originally designed to Stage 3 level detail during 17th edition times (2017)


2. Updated by consultant to Stage 4 detail mid 2019, still design and build, but not updated in line with 18th edition (presumably erroneous thinking on the part of the consultant that because the job was to the 17th and the stage 4 was not considered a major redesign from first principles, then it did not need updating)


3. Job being installed now in 2020.


4. Given that the contractor has taken on design responsibility, are they right to try and claim additional costs for redesigning in line with the 18th edition? Or would they be expected to have noted and included for this seeing as they were appointed late 2019? 


I think personally that it would be argued the contractor should have picked this up and flagged in their pricing that they would need to update the design to the 18th.


What do others think?




Parents
  • BS7671:2018 was released on the 1st July 2018 and will become effective from 1st January 2019, but the new edition can be used immediately.


    The consultant reworked the design in 2019, after the new regs came into force.


    So how and why has the contractor assumed any responsibility for the design whatsoever and why would they be expected to realise that the consultant had not designed in accordance with the current regulations?


    Surely they were given plans and specifications to price from, why is it their fault if what the client wants was not what they were told to price for?


    Andy B.
Reply
  • BS7671:2018 was released on the 1st July 2018 and will become effective from 1st January 2019, but the new edition can be used immediately.


    The consultant reworked the design in 2019, after the new regs came into force.


    So how and why has the contractor assumed any responsibility for the design whatsoever and why would they be expected to realise that the consultant had not designed in accordance with the current regulations?


    Surely they were given plans and specifications to price from, why is it their fault if what the client wants was not what they were told to price for?


    Andy B.
Children
No Data