This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Old design to 17th Edition updated to 18th - query on responsibilities

Hi All


Slightly convoluted question:


1. A design and build job originally designed to Stage 3 level detail during 17th edition times (2017)


2. Updated by consultant to Stage 4 detail mid 2019, still design and build, but not updated in line with 18th edition (presumably erroneous thinking on the part of the consultant that because the job was to the 17th and the stage 4 was not considered a major redesign from first principles, then it did not need updating)


3. Job being installed now in 2020.


4. Given that the contractor has taken on design responsibility, are they right to try and claim additional costs for redesigning in line with the 18th edition? Or would they be expected to have noted and included for this seeing as they were appointed late 2019? 


I think personally that it would be argued the contractor should have picked this up and flagged in their pricing that they would need to update the design to the 18th.


What do others think?




Parents
  • Hi Andy, the actual documentation does actually clearly say design responsibility to be with the contractor and lists all the elements. 


    So a little too much was done then.


    Also seen another clause that says design to be to current BS7671 regs.


    Maybe a case of the spec being a last line of defence to cover a rushed and flawed design that could quite easily have been updated to 18th.


    Also thanks for your insight Andy J.


    Good point, but I think for this job it was likely not updated because someone forgot the 18th was in force as supposed to any practical reason



Reply
  • Hi Andy, the actual documentation does actually clearly say design responsibility to be with the contractor and lists all the elements. 


    So a little too much was done then.


    Also seen another clause that says design to be to current BS7671 regs.


    Maybe a case of the spec being a last line of defence to cover a rushed and flawed design that could quite easily have been updated to 18th.


    Also thanks for your insight Andy J.


    Good point, but I think for this job it was likely not updated because someone forgot the 18th was in force as supposed to any practical reason



Children
No Data