Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 20 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 1870 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

Supply for a camper van.

AncientMariner
A neighbour has just bought a camper van and I noticed that it is plugged into a garage socket whilst it is on the drive. I guess this so that they can do any fitting out it needs and keeping it's battery charged.


Having been reading the posts on EV charging, I am wondering whether similar requirements would apply to a regular 13A socket whether inside the garage, or outside the garage?  The supply is 1-phase TN-S 

Clive
Parents
  • 0
    Any infringement of the ESQCR regs will be dealt with firmly and swiftly by the DNOs. As was witnessed when the picture guide book came up with the hairbrained scheme to "improve" the DNOs network. This was the horror whereby many rods were to be installed in peoples front gardens and patios to "reduce" an already low impedance. Ill conceived, needless to say didnt get past the sham "public" consultation period. 


    Clash head on? I think our poster is flattering himself, there will be no clash, if incidents are reported to the DNO regarding  a PME breach the consumer will be at risk of losing the facility on safety grounds. (By law)


    "its the supplier who has the duty to comply" Not true, It is the designer/specifier/installer who must be clear of their of their reasons and acknowledge their accountability in making such a decision.


    Regards UKPN. 


Reply
  • 0
    Any infringement of the ESQCR regs will be dealt with firmly and swiftly by the DNOs. As was witnessed when the picture guide book came up with the hairbrained scheme to "improve" the DNOs network. This was the horror whereby many rods were to be installed in peoples front gardens and patios to "reduce" an already low impedance. Ill conceived, needless to say didnt get past the sham "public" consultation period. 


    Clash head on? I think our poster is flattering himself, there will be no clash, if incidents are reported to the DNO regarding  a PME breach the consumer will be at risk of losing the facility on safety grounds. (By law)


    "its the supplier who has the duty to comply" Not true, It is the designer/specifier/installer who must be clear of their of their reasons and acknowledge their accountability in making such a decision.


    Regards UKPN. 


Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines