This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Fireproofing in cable calculations

Hi


I wondered if I could ask help from the forum with a long overdue project for the C&G2396 course. Struggling a bit.


In a nutshell, how would you derate for fireproofing when a circuit goes from room to room?


It's a lighting circuit wired in 1.5mm singles in steel conduit, passing through several internal concrete block walls, within the screed across floors and up and across wall chases to wall-mounted light fittings.


I gather concrete walls should be at least 90mm thick (Googling), so every time the conduit goes through a wall I guess it would be surrounded by 100mm thermal insulation (derating factor 0.78, Reg 523.9) because of the fire-proofing around the conduit. I thought maybe I should use this on top of Ref Method B for the bits in the screed and wall chases (59B non-sheathed or single-core cables in conduit in masonry). 0.78 x (16.5/19.5) = 0.66 [using Table 4D2A 1.5mm single will carry 19.5A clipped direct, 16.5A Ref Method B].


But then I worried that I should use Ref Method A (1A non-sheathed cables in conduit in thermally insulated wall) because of the fire-proofing. 14/19.5=0.72 [using Table 4D2A 1.5mm single will carry 19.5A clipped direct, 14A Ref Method A]. I was surprised it resulted in a better deal, as I'd been taught Ref Method A was the worst case scenario.


So I think I have it quite wrong.


...Also if Ref Method A makes sense here then doesn't that mean you wouldn't be able to use anything other than Ref Method A (worst case scenario) for any system that passes from room to room, anywhere at all?


Yes, I think I have it very quite wrong.


Any help would be greatly appreciated,


Suki

Parents
  • Hi Andy,


     Thank you very much for your swift reply, and for the helpful information.


    Yes, I had been incorrectly imagining intumescent fireproofing. Thank you for taking the time to put me right.


    Not much experience here as you might imagine!


    With much appreciation and thanks again,


    Suki
Reply
  • Hi Andy,


     Thank you very much for your swift reply, and for the helpful information.


    Yes, I had been incorrectly imagining intumescent fireproofing. Thank you for taking the time to put me right.


    Not much experience here as you might imagine!


    With much appreciation and thanks again,


    Suki
Children
No Data