This discussion is locked.
You cannot post a reply to this discussion. If you have a question start a new discussion

Fireproofing in cable calculations

Hi


I wondered if I could ask help from the forum with a long overdue project for the C&G2396 course. Struggling a bit.


In a nutshell, how would you derate for fireproofing when a circuit goes from room to room?


It's a lighting circuit wired in 1.5mm singles in steel conduit, passing through several internal concrete block walls, within the screed across floors and up and across wall chases to wall-mounted light fittings.


I gather concrete walls should be at least 90mm thick (Googling), so every time the conduit goes through a wall I guess it would be surrounded by 100mm thermal insulation (derating factor 0.78, Reg 523.9) because of the fire-proofing around the conduit. I thought maybe I should use this on top of Ref Method B for the bits in the screed and wall chases (59B non-sheathed or single-core cables in conduit in masonry). 0.78 x (16.5/19.5) = 0.66 [using Table 4D2A 1.5mm single will carry 19.5A clipped direct, 16.5A Ref Method B].


But then I worried that I should use Ref Method A (1A non-sheathed cables in conduit in thermally insulated wall) because of the fire-proofing. 14/19.5=0.72 [using Table 4D2A 1.5mm single will carry 19.5A clipped direct, 14A Ref Method A]. I was surprised it resulted in a better deal, as I'd been taught Ref Method A was the worst case scenario.


So I think I have it quite wrong.


...Also if Ref Method A makes sense here then doesn't that mean you wouldn't be able to use anything other than Ref Method A (worst case scenario) for any system that passes from room to room, anywhere at all?


Yes, I think I have it very quite wrong.


Any help would be greatly appreciated,


Suki

Parents
  • Yes, it is a bit more physics-ish than perhaps one is used to. If you take a bit of copper wire and heat one end in a flame, the thermal conductivity quickly heats quite a length to an uncomfortable holding temperature, moving the heat along the wire by thermal conduction. The same applies to conduit or trunking, we do not get an immediate "hot spot", just a spread out temperature which may be slightly higher than the rest, but not excessive. The wall also has a property called thermal capacity, a bit like the bricks in a storage heater which are made of a material with a very high value. This means that it takes a long time for this heating of the wall to happen, and of course more spread out, losing the heat to the atmosphere by convection and to a slight degree radiation.


    If the wall is very thick and the expected temperature rise high, one might use somewhat thicker cables, which both reduce the resistive loss and provide more conduction along the length of the cable, to the outside of the wall. All this is the theory, in reality, one does not find damaged cables in short lengths through walls which is why the condition is not discussed very much in textbooks or lectures. Cables buried in insulation are a rather different thing, because the length is too long for much conduction outside the insulation, and in general cables surrounded by serious insulation are a bad idea (because they end up very large and therefore expensive) and it is wise to make a route without long lengths buried. This does not apply of course to lightly loaded cables, or short lengths dropping through for say a light drop in the roof space.


    David
Reply
  • Yes, it is a bit more physics-ish than perhaps one is used to. If you take a bit of copper wire and heat one end in a flame, the thermal conductivity quickly heats quite a length to an uncomfortable holding temperature, moving the heat along the wire by thermal conduction. The same applies to conduit or trunking, we do not get an immediate "hot spot", just a spread out temperature which may be slightly higher than the rest, but not excessive. The wall also has a property called thermal capacity, a bit like the bricks in a storage heater which are made of a material with a very high value. This means that it takes a long time for this heating of the wall to happen, and of course more spread out, losing the heat to the atmosphere by convection and to a slight degree radiation.


    If the wall is very thick and the expected temperature rise high, one might use somewhat thicker cables, which both reduce the resistive loss and provide more conduction along the length of the cable, to the outside of the wall. All this is the theory, in reality, one does not find damaged cables in short lengths through walls which is why the condition is not discussed very much in textbooks or lectures. Cables buried in insulation are a rather different thing, because the length is too long for much conduction outside the insulation, and in general cables surrounded by serious insulation are a bad idea (because they end up very large and therefore expensive) and it is wise to make a route without long lengths buried. This does not apply of course to lightly loaded cables, or short lengths dropping through for say a light drop in the roof space.


    David
Children
No Data