Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 11 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 1033 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

PRS SECONDS AWAY ROUND 2

John Peckham
I had an email today from one of my network of contractors concerning a refusal by a letting agent accepting an EIC for the purposes of satisfying the requirements for PRS.


The installation is new in May this year and the contractor has issued an EIC for 10 years. The letting agent has refused the EIC and wants an EICR to satisfy the requirements for letting and the PRS .


My observations are.


1. We teach inspecting and testing students that an EICR is a "report" and not a certificate.

2. We teach inspecting and testing students that an EIC is a "certificate" and not a "report".

3. The PRS legislation requires a "report" from a qualified  person. No mention of a certificate.

4. The duration of the required report is 5 years.

5. The average letting agent will normaly accept any old bit of paper from one of their tame contractors written on the back of a bus ticket in crayon by a knuckle scraping half wit.


So what does the forum think, was the letting agent right to refuse an EIC and only accept an EICR?


Parents
  • 0
    I have just read Johns posting of the Government advice, and it is daft. This is what should happen:

    If I have an unsatisfactory EICR and remedial work is carried out, and an EIC should be issued. A letter from the landlord saying it is fixed is nothing like correct! A copy of the EIC should be provided along with the failed EICR to the tenant. This proves that the work has been done properly, and says who did it. Otherwise I would expect any old bodge-up and a fake letter.


    The fact that the Government has got this process completely wrong is serious. Something needs to be done now to correct it.
Reply
  • 0
    I have just read Johns posting of the Government advice, and it is daft. This is what should happen:

    If I have an unsatisfactory EICR and remedial work is carried out, and an EIC should be issued. A letter from the landlord saying it is fixed is nothing like correct! A copy of the EIC should be provided along with the failed EICR to the tenant. This proves that the work has been done properly, and says who did it. Otherwise I would expect any old bodge-up and a fake letter.


    The fact that the Government has got this process completely wrong is serious. Something needs to be done now to correct it.
Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines