Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 53 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 3314 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

NON COMPLIANT NEW EV INSTALLATIONS

John Peckham
I was sent some information from the ECA concerning an audit undertaken by the Office of Low Emission Vehicles.


The sites inspected were those installed by "qualified" and "registered" installers claiming the OLEV subsidy.


0.8% were found to be dangerous (C1), 19.6% Potentially Dangerous (C2) and 25.6% requires improvement (C3). That makes 46% of new EV installations by qualified and registered persons to be non-compliant.


Am I the only person who thinks this is an utter disgrace?





Parents
  • 0
    I don’t suppose it says how many were audited?


    That implies that eight out of a thousand are dangerous C1, which is actually a hell of a lot.


    Indeed less than one in five of the PRS inspections are likely to be recorded as a C2.


     Andy B.
Reply
  • 0
    I don’t suppose it says how many were audited?


    That implies that eight out of a thousand are dangerous C1, which is actually a hell of a lot.


    Indeed less than one in five of the PRS inspections are likely to be recorded as a C2.


     Andy B.
Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines