Rules and Guidelines
Want to participate in the discussions? Please read our Community Rules and Guidelines. Need some help? Visit Support and Answers.

  • State Not Answered
  • Locked Locked
  • Replies 53 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 3838 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
You may also be interested in
This discussion has been locked.
You can no longer post new replies to this discussion. If you have a question you can start a new discussion

NON COMPLIANT NEW EV INSTALLATIONS

John Peckham
I was sent some information from the ECA concerning an audit undertaken by the Office of Low Emission Vehicles.


The sites inspected were those installed by "qualified" and "registered" installers claiming the OLEV subsidy.


0.8% were found to be dangerous (C1), 19.6% Potentially Dangerous (C2) and 25.6% requires improvement (C3). That makes 46% of new EV installations by qualified and registered persons to be non-compliant.


Am I the only person who thinks this is an utter disgrace?





Parents
  • 0
    A friend of mine (plumbing and heating trade) paid a lorra money to do a 4 week course.

    He stated that it taught him nowt about electrics or the regs, just how to pass the exam.


    I must admit, the last regs course I did was all about getting a pass and not really about understanding the regs themselves. Compared to my pre 2000 course and exam it was carp (and expensive)
Reply
  • 0
    A friend of mine (plumbing and heating trade) paid a lorra money to do a 4 week course.

    He stated that it taught him nowt about electrics or the regs, just how to pass the exam.


    I must admit, the last regs course I did was all about getting a pass and not really about understanding the regs themselves. Compared to my pre 2000 course and exam it was carp (and expensive)
Children
No Data

Community Rules & Guidelines